Citations (40)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (4)
Davor Šušković, Siniša Fajt & Vladimir Olujić. (2021) Speech intelligibility in different types of audiograms and speech audiometry by using the simulated hearing loss on the speech material with normal hearing people. Automatika 62:1, pages 118-126.
Read now
Read now
Varsha H. Rallapalli & Joshua M. Alexander. (2019) Effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition with variants of a multichannel adaptive dynamic range compression scheme. International Journal of Audiology 58:10, pages 661-669.
Read now
Read now
Steffen Kortlang, Zhangli Chen, Timo Gerkmann, Birger Kollmeier, Volker Hohmann & Stephan D. Ewert. (2018) Evaluation of combined dynamic compression and single channel noise reduction for hearing aid applications. International Journal of Audiology 57:sup3, pages S43-S54.
Read now
Read now
Bruno Gingras, Manuela M. Marin & W. Tecumseh Fitch. (2014) Beyond intensity: Spectral features effectively predict music-induced subjective arousal. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67:7, pages 1428-1446.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (36)
Kaylah Lalonde, Elizabeth A. WalkerLori J. Leibold & Ryan W. McCreery. (2023) Predictors of Susceptibility to Noise and Speech Masking Among School-Age Children With Hearing Loss or Typical Hearing. Ear & Hearing.
Crossref
Crossref
Donghyeon Yun, Yi Shen & Jennifer J. Lentz. (2023) Verification of Estimated Output Signal-to-Noise Ratios From a Phase Inversion Technique Using a Simulated Hearing Aid. American Journal of Audiology 32:1, pages 197-209.
Crossref
Crossref
Niels Overby, Torsten Dau & Tobias May. (2023) A Data-driven Distance Metric for Evaluating the effects of Dynamic Range Compression in Adverse Conditions. Trends in Hearing 27.
Crossref
Crossref
Marc A. Brennan, Ryan W. McCreery & John Massey. (2021) Influence of Audibility and Distortion on Recognition of Reverberant Speech for Children and Adults with Hearing Aid Amplification. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 33:03, pages 170-180.
Crossref
Crossref
Pamela E. Souza, Gregory Ellis, Kendra Marks, Richard Wright & Frederick Gallun. (2021) Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 64:6, pages 2053-2069.
Crossref
Crossref
Ruwei Li, Kaixuan Dai, Zelin Ye & Yongya Zahng. (2021) RETRACTED: Multi-channel adaptive loudness compensation algorithm based on noise tracking in digital hearing aids. Speech Communication 130, pages 64-76.
Crossref
Crossref
Alex G. Armstrong, Chi Chung Lam, Shievanie Sabesan & Nicholas A. Lesica. (2021) Compression and amplification algorithms in hearing aids impair the selectivity of neural responses to speech. Nature Biomedical Engineering 6:6, pages 717-730.
Crossref
Crossref
Katrien Kestens, Sofie Degeest & Hannah Keppler. (2021) The Effect of Cognition on the Aided Benefit in Terms of Speech Understanding and Listening Effort Obtained With Digital Hearing Aids: A Systematic Review. American Journal of Audiology 30:1, pages 190-210.
Crossref
Crossref
Fangqi Liu & Andreas Demosthenous. (2020) Effect of Time Constant on Speech Enhancement in Hearing Aids Based on Auditory Neural Feedback. Effect of Time Constant on Speech Enhancement in Hearing Aids Based on Auditory Neural Feedback.
Marina Salorio-Corbetto, Thomas Baer, Michael A. Stone & Brian C. J. Moore. (2020) Effect of the number of amplitude-compression channels and compression speed on speech recognition by listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147:3, pages 1344-1358.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael A. Stone, Garreth Prendergast & Shanelle Canavan. (2020) Measuring access to high-modulation-rate envelope speech cues in clinically fitted auditory prostheses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 147:2, pages 1284-1301.
Crossref
Crossref
Tobias May, Borys Kowalewski & Torsten Dau. 2020. The Technology of Binaural Understanding. The Technology of Binaural Understanding
763
799
.
Nitya Tiwari & Prem C. Pandey. (2019) Sliding-band dynamic range compression for use in hearing aids. International Journal of Speech Technology 22:4, pages 911-926.
Crossref
Crossref
Borys Kowalewski, Johannes Zaar, Michal Fereczkowski, Ewen N. MacDonald, Olaf Strelcyk, Tobias May & Torsten Dau. (2018) Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners’ Consonant–Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651880087.
Crossref
Crossref
Tobias May, Borys Kowalewski & Torsten Dau. (2018) Signal-to-Noise-Ratio-Aware Dynamic Range Compression in Hearing Aids. Trends in Hearing 22, pages 233121651879090.
Crossref
Crossref
Ryan M. Corey & Andrew C. Singer. (2017) Dynamic range compression for noisy mixtures using source separation and beamforming. Dynamic range compression for noisy mixtures using source separation and beamforming.
Joshua M. Alexander & Varsha Rallapalli. (2017) Acoustic and perceptual effects of amplitude and frequency compression on high-frequency speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142:2, pages 908-923.
Crossref
Crossref
Tobias May, Borys Kowalewski, Michal Fereczkowski & Ewen N. MacDonald. (2017) Assessment of broadband SNR estimation for hearing aid applications. Assessment of broadband SNR estimation for hearing aid applications.
Koenraad S. RhebergenThijs H. MaalderinkWouter A. Dreschler. (2017) Characterizing Speech Intelligibility in Noise After Wide Dynamic Range Compression. Ear & Hearing 38:2, pages 194-204.
Crossref
Crossref
Thijs van de Laar & Bert de Vries. (2016) A Probabilistic Modeling Approach to Hearing Loss Compensation. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 24:11, pages 2200-2213.
Crossref
Crossref
Steffen Kortlang, Giso Grimm, Volker Hohmann, Birger Kollmeier & Stephan D. Ewert. (2016) Auditory Model-Based Dynamic Compression Controlled by Subband Instantaneous Frequency and Speech Presence Probability Estimates. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 24:10, pages 1759-1772.
Crossref
Crossref
Paul N. Reinhart, Pamela E. Souza, Nirmal K. Srinivasan & Frederick J. Gallun. (2016) Effects of Reverberation and Compression on Consonant Identification in Individuals with Hearing Impairment. Ear & Hearing 37:2, pages 144-152.
Crossref
Crossref
Martin Kirchberger & Frank A. Russo. (2016) Dynamic Range Across Music Genres and the Perception of Dynamic Compression in Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Trends in Hearing 20, pages 233121651663054.
Crossref
Crossref
Steffen Kortlang, Manfred Mauermann & Stephan D. Ewert. (2016) Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age. Hearing Research 331, pages 27-40.
Crossref
Crossref
Pamela Souza, Kathryn Arehart & Tobias Neher. (2015) Working Memory and Hearing Aid Processing: Literature Findings, Future Directions, and Clinical Applications. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
Crossref
Crossref
Andrew T. Sabin & Pamela E. Souza. (2013) Initial Development of a Temporal-Envelope-Preserving Nonlinear Hearing Aid Prescription Using a Genetic Algorithm. Trends in Amplification 17:2, pages 94-107.
Crossref
Crossref
Nicolas Ellaham, Christian Giguere & Wail Gueaieb. (2013) Evaluation of the Phase-Inversion Signal Separation Method When Using Nonlinear Hearing Aids. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 21:4, pages 879-888.
Crossref
Crossref
Olaf Strelcyk, Ning Li, Joyce Rodriguez, Sridhar Kalluri & Brent Edwards. (2013) Multichannel compression hearing aids: Effect of channel bandwidth on consonant and vowel identification by hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133:3, pages 1598-1606.
Crossref
Crossref
Ian M. Wiggins & Bernhard U. Seeber. (2013) Linking dynamic-range compression across the ears can improve speech intelligibility in spatially separated noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133:2, pages 1004-1016.
Crossref
Crossref
Naomi B. H. Croghan, Kathryn H. Arehart & James M. Kates. (2012) Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132:2, pages 1177-1188.
Crossref
Crossref
Pamela Souza, Eric Hoover & Frederick Gallun. (2012) Application of the Envelope Difference Index to Spectrally Sparse Speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55:3, pages 824-837.
Crossref
Crossref
Ian M. Wiggins & Bernhard U. Seeber. (2011) Dynamic-range compression affects the lateral position of sounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130:6, pages 3939-3953.
Crossref
Crossref
Philipos C. Loizou & Jianfen Ma. (2011) Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130:2, pages 986-995.
Crossref
Crossref
James M. Kates. (2011) Spectro-temporal envelope changes caused by temporal fine structure modification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129:6, pages 3981-3990.
Crossref
Crossref
A. Uriz, P. Agüero, F. Denk, J. Tulli, E. Gonzàlez & J. Castiñeira. (2011) Simulador de Deficiencias Auditivas. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática Industrial RIAI 8:2, pages 52-62.
Crossref
Crossref
Karolina Smeds & Arne Leijon. 2011. Loudness. Loudness
223
259
.