Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 53, 2014 - Issue 11
Submit an article Journal homepage
296
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users

Femke L. Theelen–van den HoekAcademic Medical Center Amsterdam, Clinical and Experimental Audiology, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Rolph HoubenAcademic Medical Center Amsterdam, Clinical and Experimental Audiology, The Netherlands
&
Wouter A. DreschlerAcademic Medical Center Amsterdam, Clinical and Experimental Audiology, The Netherlands
Pages 817-828 | Received 08 May 2013, Accepted 04 May 2014, Published online: 30 Jun 2014

Citations (13)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (4)

Lisa G. Potts, Alison M. Olivo, Ruth M. Reeder & Jill B. Firszt. (2023) Evaluation of the American English Matrix Test with Cochlear Implant Recipients. International Journal of Audiology 0:0, pages 1-7.
Read now
Samanta Gallo & Alessandro Castiglione. (2019) The signal-to-noise ratio assessment in cochlear implanted patients through the Italian Matrix Sentence test (Oldenburg test). Hearing, Balance and Communication 17:2, pages 145-148.
Read now
Lidwien C. E. Veugen, Josef Chalupper, Lucas H. M. Mens, Ad F. M. Snik & A. John van Opstal. (2017) Effect of extreme adaptive frequency compression in bimodal listeners on sound localization and speech perception. Cochlear Implants International 18:5, pages 266-277.
Read now
Femke L. Theelen–van den Hoek, Monique Boymans, Bas van Dijk & Wouter A. Dreschler. (2016) Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition. International Journal of Audiology 55:11, pages 674-687.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (9)

Lars Lambriks, Marc van Hoof, Joke Debruyne, Miranda Janssen, Josef Chalupper, Kiki van der Heijden, Janny Hof, Katja Hellingman, Elke Devocht & Erwin George. (2023) Imaging-based frequency mapping for cochlear implants – Evaluated using a daily randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Neuroscience 17.
Crossref
L. J. G. Lambriks, M. van Hoof, J. A. Debruyne, M. Janssen, J. Chalupper, K. A. van der Heijden, J. R. Hof, C. A. Hellingman, E. L. J. George & E. M. J. Devocht. (2020) Evaluating hearing performance with cochlear implants within the same patient using daily randomization and imaging-based fitting - The ELEPHANT study. Trials 21:1.
Crossref
Flavia Gheller, Elisa Lovo, Athena Arsie & Roberto Bovo. (2019) Classroom acoustics: Listening problems in children. Building Acoustics 27:1, pages 47-59.
Crossref
Snandan Sharma, Lucas H. M. Mens, Ad F. M. Snik, A. John van Opstal & Marc M. van Wanrooij. (2019) An Individual With Hearing Preservation and Bimodal Hearing Using a Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aids Has Perturbed Sound Localization but Preserved Speech Perception. Frontiers in Neurology 10.
Crossref
Gertjan Dingemanse & André Goedegebure. (2020) Efficient Adaptive Speech Reception Threshold Measurements Using Stochastic Approximation Algorithms. Trends in Hearing 23, pages 233121652091919.
Crossref
J. Gertjan Dingemanse & André Goedegebure. (2019) The Important Role of Contextual Information in Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users and Its Consequences in Speech Tests. Trends in Hearing 23, pages 233121651983867.
Crossref
Elke M. J. Devocht, A. Miranda L. Janssen, Josef Chalupper, Robert J. Stokroos & Erwin L. J. George. (2017) The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality. Trends in Hearing 21, pages 233121651772790.
Crossref
Elke M. J. Devocht, A. Miranda L. Janssen, Josef Chalupper, Robert J. Stokroos & Erwin L. J. George. (2016) Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type. PLOS ONE 11:8, pages e0160829.
Crossref
Rolph Houben & Wouter A. Dreschler. (2015) Optimization of the Dutch Matrix Test by Random Selection of Sentences From a Preselected Subset. Trends in Hearing 19, pages 233121651558313.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.