Citations (25)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (15)
Jihee Woo & Wanho Jang. (2023) Barriers and facilitators of assistive technology service delivery process (AT-SDP) in South Korea. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 18:6, pages 714-721.
Read now
Read now
Madelyn Betz, Carmen P. DiGiovine, Peyton Galbreath, Ashley Stojkov, Theresa Berner, Rachel Hibbs & Richard M. Schein. (2022) Service delivery for complex rehabilitation technology: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 17:8, pages 853-871.
Read now
Read now
Rosemary J. Gowran, Amanda Clifford, Andrea Gallagher, Jennifer McKee, Bernadette O’Regan & Elizabeth A. McKay. (2022) Wheelchair and seating assistive technology provision: a gateway to freedom. Disability and Rehabilitation 44:3, pages 370-381.
Read now
Read now
Åse Brandt, Else Marie Hansen & Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen. (2020) The effects of assistive technology service delivery processes and factors associated with positive outcomes – a systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 15:5, pages 590-603.
Read now
Read now
Cathrine Widehammar, Kajsa Lidström Holmqvist, Ingvor Pettersson & Liselotte Norling Hermansson. (2020) Attitudes is the most important environmental factor for use of powered mobility devices – users’ perspectives. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 27:4, pages 298-308.
Read now
Read now
Emily J. Steel. (2020) Content analysis to locate assistive technology in Queensland’s motor injury insurance rehabilitation legislation and guidelines. Assistive Technology 32:2, pages 74-78.
Read now
Read now
Åsa Larsson Ranada & Helene Lidström. (2019) Satisfaction with assistive technology device in relation to the service delivery process—A systematic review. Assistive Technology 31:2, pages 82-97.
Read now
Read now
Stina Meyer Larsen, Rikke Falgreen Mortensen, Hanne Kaae Kristensen & Lise Hounsgaard. (2019) Older adults’ perspectives on the process of becoming users of assistive technology: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 14:2, pages 182-193.
Read now
Read now
Terje Sund & Åse Brandt. (2018) Adult Scandinavians’ use of powered scooters: user satisfaction, frequency of use, and prediction of daily use. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 13:3, pages 212-219.
Read now
Read now
Lorenzo Desideri, Brunella Stefanelli, Claudio Bitelli, Uta Roentgen, Gert-Jan Gelderblom & Luc de Witte. (2016) Satisfaction of users with assistive technology service delivery: An exploratory analysis of experiences of parents of children with physical and multiple disabilities. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 19:4, pages 255-266.
Read now
Read now
Emily J. Steel, Natasha Ann Layton, Michele M. Foster & Sally Bennett. (2016) Challenges of user-centred assistive technology provision in Australia: shopping without a prescription. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 11:3, pages 235-240.
Read now
Read now
Emma L. Friesen, Deborah Theodoros & Trevor G. Russell. (2015) Use, performance and features of mobile shower commodes: perspectives of adults with spinal cord injury and expert clinicians. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 10:1, pages 38-45.
Read now
Read now
Hsin-Yi Liu, Rosemarie Cooper, Annmarie Kelleher & Rory A. Cooper. (2014) An interview study for developing a user guide for powered seating function usage. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 9:6, pages 499-512.
Read now
Read now
Astrid Gramstad, Sissel Lisa Storli & Torunn Hamran. (2014) Older individuals' experiences during the assistive technology device service delivery process. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 21:4, pages 305-312.
Read now
Read now
Terje Sund, Susanne Iwarsson, Heidi Anttila, Tina Helle & Åse Brandt. (2014) Test–retest reliability and agreement of the Satisfaction with the Assistive Technology Services (SATS) instrument in two Nordic countries. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 30:5, pages 367-374.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (10)
Belinda Robertson, Rachel Lane, Natasha Lannin, Kate Laver & Christopher Barr. (2023) A Systematic Review of Outcomes Measured Following New Wheelchair and Seating-Prescription Interventions in Adults. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation 5:1, pages 100249.
Crossref
Crossref
Nathan Martin D'Cunha, Stephen Isbel, John Goss, Lynne Pezzullo, Nenad Naumovski & Diane Gibson. (2022) Assistive technology, information asymmetry and the role of brokerage services: a scoping review. BMJ Open 12:12, pages e063938.
Crossref
Crossref
Claudia Salatino, Lucia Pigini & Renzo Andrich. (2018) How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life?. How to measure the impact of assistive technology solutions on the person's quality of life?.
Terje Sund, Åse Brandt, Heidi Anttila & Susanne Iwarsson. (2016) Psychometric properties of the NOMO 1.0 tested among adult powered-mobility users. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 84:1, pages 34-46.
Crossref
Crossref
Emily J. Steel & Natasha A. Layton. (2016) Assistive Technology in Australia: Integrating theory and evidence into action. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 63:6, pages 381-390.
Crossref
Crossref
W. Ben Mortenson & Jenny Kim. (2016) Scoping review of mobility scooter-related research studies. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 53:5, pages 531-540.
Crossref
Crossref
Terje Sund, Susanne Iwarsson, Heidi Anttila & Åse Brandt. (2015) Effectiveness of Powered Mobility Devices in Enabling Community Mobility-Related Participation: A Prospective Study Among People With Mobility Restrictions. PM&R 7:8, pages 859-870.
Crossref
Crossref
Åse Brandt & Kersti A. M. Samuelsson. 2015. International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions. International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions
299
309
.
Karla Emanuelle Cotias de Carvalho, Miburge Bolívar Gois Júnior & Katia Nunes Sá. (2014) Translation and validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) into Portuguese. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia (English Edition) 54:4, pages 260-267.
Crossref
Crossref
Karla Emanuelle Cotias de Carvalho, Miburge Bolívar Gois Júnior & Katia Nunes Sá. (2014) Tradução e validação do Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) para o idioma português do Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia 54:4, pages 260-267.
Crossref
Crossref