Abstract
Objectives
The pathogenesis of isolated rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorders (iRBD) is poorly understood. The severity of RBD may reflect its pathogenesis.
Methods
We compared motor function and non-motor symptoms (NMSs) between iRBD patients and healthy volunteers. We correlated motor function, NMSs, and striatal dopaminergic activity with RBD severity using video-polysomnography.
Results
Twenty-one iRBD patients and 17 controls participated. The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part III scores were higher in patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). There was no difference in upper extremity function between patients and controls (right, p = 0.220; left, p = 0.209), but gait was slower in iRBD patients (walking time, p < 0.001; number of steps, p < 0.001). The mean value of the Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Exam and Clinical Dementia Rating were lower in patients (p = 0.006, p = 0.003, respectively). Patients with were also more depressed (p = 0.002), had decreased olfactory function (p < 0.001), reported more frequent sleep/fatigue episodes (p < 0.001), worse attention/memory capacity (p < 0.001), gastrointestinal problems (p = 0.009), urinary problems (p = 0.007), and pain (p = 0.083). Further, iRBD patients reported more frequent sleep-related disturbances (p = 0.004), but no difference in daytime sleepiness (p = 0.663). Disease severity was correlated with pain (r = 0.686, p = 0.002) and visuospatial function (r= −0.507, p = 0.038). There were no correlations between RBD severity and striatal dopaminergic activities (p > 0.09).
Conclusions
iRBD is a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder, and gait abnormalities may be a disease characteristic, possibly related to the akinetic-rigid phenotype of Parkinson’s disease. The correlation between pain/visuospatial dysfunction and RBD severity may be related to its pathogenesis.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of our hospital (IRB No. 17-675) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.