CT volumetry study of microfat graft survival from different donor sites in augmenting the enophthalmic socket

ABSTRACT

Purpose

To evaluate autologous fat grafts harvested from the abdomen versus the thigh for treating the enophthalmic socket using CT volumetry.

Methods

A randomized prospective interventional study including 20 patients suffering from unilateral enophthalmic socket. Pre-operative clinical assessment included photographs, exophthalmometry reading as well as CT volumetry for volume deficit calculations and the harvesting site was randomly allocated (abdomen or thigh). All patients completed 6 months of follow-up. Exophthalmometry change and percentage of retained fat with the globe included and without it at follow-up were measured.

Results

Microfat graft survival showed no statistically significant correlation with sex, age, or donor site. Mean percentage of retained fat with globe and without it were 14.75% and 25.31%, respectively. Difficulty of extraction and degree of volume deficit correlated significantly with percentage of fat retained. Exophthalmometer change correlated significantly with percentage of fat retained.

Conclusion

Autologous fat grafting is a safe and effective technique for volume augmentation of enophthalmic sockets regardless of its harvesting site. CT volumetry has an important role in accurately measuring the volume deficit as well as the postoperative results.

KEYWORDS:

• Autologous fat graft
• CT volumetry
• enophthalmic sokcets

Disclosure statement

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.