Abstract
Introduction
Remote traumatic intracranial haemorrhage (RTIH) may develop after neurosurgery. Recognition of the risk factors for RTIH before surgery might be of great value. The purpose of this study was to verify if the fibrin/fibrinogen degradation product (FDP) value may be a risk factor for RTIH.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of the data of 56 patients with traumatic intracranial hematomas shown on initial computed tomography (CT) who were treated with craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy and underwent a follow-up CT at a single centre over a period of approximately 10.5 years. We divided the patients into 2 groups: those who developed RTIH (Positive: P-group) and those who did not (Negative: N-group). We compared the 2 groups in terms of not only the laboratory data before surgery, but also patient age, sex, antiplatelet/antithrombotic medications received, cause of injury, and GCS score on arrival.
Results
RTIH was observed in 22 patients (P-group, 39.3%). The FDP value was the only significant risk factor identified in this study (p = 0.00076). The cut-off value was estimated on the basis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The cut-off FDP value was 120 µg/mL (63.6% sensitivity and 85.3% specificity).
Conclusions
FDP levels over 120 µg/mL were determined to be a risk factor for progressive RTIH after neurosurgery. We suggest the FDP level be checked before surgery for traumatic intracranial haemorrhage and follow-up CT be done as soon as possible after the surgery if the serum FDP level is over 120 µg/mL.
Acknowledgements
We thank F. Miyamasu, Medical English Communications Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, for native English revision.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients included in the study.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).