495
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Child- compared with parent-report ratings on psychosocial measures following a mild traumatic brain injury among youth with persistent post-concussion symptoms

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 574-586 | Received 08 Sep 2020, Accepted 09 Feb 2021, Published online: 18 Mar 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Primary Objective: To compare child- and parent-report ratings on the Health Behavior Inventory, Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-Short Version (anxiety subscale), Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Pediatric Quality of Life InventoryTM among children with persistent post-concussive symptoms following a sports- or recreation-related concussion, overall and by child age and gender.

Research Design: Cross-sectional study examining baseline data from a randomized, comparative effectiveness trial.

Methods and Procedures: Inter-rater reliability was assessed using two-way random effects model (absolute agreement) intraclass correlations, correlations were examined using Spearman’s rho, mean differences were determined using paired t-tests, and agreement was examined using Bland–Altman plots.

Main Outcomes and Results: The final analytic sample was 200 parent–child dyads [child Mage = 14.7 (95% CI: 14.5, 15.0)]. Reliability and correlations were modest overall. When considering child age and gender, reliability ranged from poor to excellent (−1.01–0.95) and correlations ranged from weak to strong (−0.64–0.94). Overall, children reported more symptoms but better functioning than parents, and mean differences in scores were greater among females (versus males) and ages 16–18 (versus younger groups).

Conclusions: Findings should inform the use and interpretation of psychosocial measures when developing appropriate youth concussion treatment plans.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Drs. Jinguji, Quitiquit, and Osorio for referring patients to the study. We also thank Teah Hoopes for her meticulous study oversight as well as the Clinical Research Coordinators who spearheaded participant recruitment and data collection efforts: Lauren Fay and Lauren Stanek. Finally, we thank the adolescents and families who participated in this research.

Disclosure of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest. The parent study, CARE4PCS II, was supported by funding from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, R01 HD090230 (PIs: McCarty, Rivara, and Zatzick).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01 HD090230].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 727.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.