Abstract
Aim: The treatment effects of spironolactone on heart failure with reduced (HFrEF LVEF <40%) and preserved (HFpEF LVEF ≥50%) ejection fraction are well characterized. It is not clear whether heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF, LVEF 40–49%) benefit from spironolactone. The present study aims to evaluate the efficacy of spironolactone in HFmrEF patients.
Method: This study compared a high dosage of spironolactone (50 mg daily), a low dosage of spironolactone (25 mg daily), and an untreated group for the prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in 279 patients admitted to hospital diagnosed with HFmrEF.
Results: With a mean follow-up duration of 1 year, the death and HF-rehospitalization rate demonstrated significantly lower incidence in those taking spironolactone, compared with the untreated group (21.3% vs 34.5%, p = .014, respectively). Further analysis showed no difference between two spironolactone groups (21.8% vs 20.7%, p = .861). Kaplan-Meier analysis of outcome-free survival illustrated a significant difference in survival rate among three groups (log-rank testing, p = .045). Compared with the baseline level, patients receiving 25 mg spironolactone had a lower physical score (p < .05) at 1-year follow-up. MLHFQ total scores in the two spironolactone groups markedly improved compared with the untreated group (p < .001); similar results were observed in the MLHFQ physical scores (p = .025, .001, respectively) and emotional sub-scale (p = .023, .011, respectively); however, paired comparison between the two spironolactone groups showed no difference.
Conclusions: In patients with HFmrEF, treatment with spironolactone significantly reduced the incidence of the primary composite outcomes of all-cause death, and rehospitalization for the management of heart failure compared with placebo, and a high dosage of spironolactone did not show trends of reduction in MACE.
Keywords:
Transparency
Declaration of funding
This manuscript was not funded.
Declaration of financial/other relationships
Xin Yanguo, Chen Xin, Zhao Yinan, Hu Jian, Sun Yingxian, and Hu Wenyu declare that they have no conflict of interest. A CMRO peer reviewer on this manuscript declares consultancy for Bayer, Astra Zeneca, Sanofi, KBP pharmaceuticals, scPharmaceuticals, Sarfez, Tricida stealth peptides and holds a patent for site-specific delivery of eplerenone to the myocardium. Other CMRO peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.
Acknowledgements
None reported.