260
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
POST-ABORTION LONG ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION

Post-abortion long-acting reversible contraception in a sample of Italian women: intrauterine device versus subdermal implant

, , , , , , , , , , ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 427-433 | Received 07 Apr 2018, Accepted 16 Oct 2018, Published online: 02 Jan 2019
 

Abstract

Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) represent an especially effective kind of post-abortion contraception. We aimed at assessing satisfaction, discontinuation, efficacy, and tolerability associated with either levonorgestrel intrauterine device (L-IUCD), the copper intrauterine device (C-IUCD) and implant (IMP) after termination of pregnancy (TOP). We recorded baseline data about the patients and performed phone surveys at 3, 6 and 12 months after insertion to assess the bleeding profile. Furthermore, women were inquired about possible adverse events, satisfaction, and discontinuation at 12 months after insertion. LARC continuers (>12 months after TOP) were divided into three groups: L-IUCD (n = 47), C-IUCD (n = 6) and IMP (n = 36). Satisfaction rates among L-IUCD users were higher than among IMP users (100% vs. 72.2%, p < .05). A higher, yet not significant, share of patients decided to withdraw contraception in IMP group (3.6% in IUCD group and 12.2% in IMP group). The bleeding profile was significantly more favorable among L-IUCD users than among IMP users. Finally, the reported rate of treatment-associated adverse events did not differ significantly among the groups. L-IUCD insertion after TOP is associated with higher satisfaction and lower discontinuation rates than IMP. Such pattern could be attributed to a more favorable bleeding profile.

摘要:

长效可逆避孕(LARC)是一种特别有效的人工流产后避孕方法。我们主要的目的是:对终止妊娠后应用左炔诺孕酮宫内节育器(L-IUCD)、含铜宫内节育器(C-IUCD)和皮下埋植剂(IMP)的患者进行满意度、停止使用、疗效和耐受性(上图)情况的评估。我们记录了患者的基线数据, 并在放置后3个月、6个月和12个月进行电话随访, 来评估出血情况。此外, 还询问了患者在采取长效可逆避孕方法后12个月中发生的不良反应、满意度和停止使用等的情况。继续使用LARC的患者(在终止妊娠后使用>12个月)被分成三组:LIUCD (n=47), C-IUCD (n=6)和IMP (n=36)。L-IUCD组患者的满意率高于IMP组患者(100% vs. 72.2%, p<.05)。在IMP组决定停止使用的比例较高, 但无显著差别(IUCD组为3.6%, IMP组为12.2%)。L-IUCD组患者的出血情况明显好于IMP组患者。最后, 治疗相关的不良反应报告率在各组之间没有显著差异。与IMP组相比, L-IUCD组患者术后满意度更高, 停用率更低。得出这种结论的原因是L-IUCD组患者出血情况的改变更能让患者接受。

The Chinese abstracts are translated by Prof. Dr. Xiangyan Ruan and her team: Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100026, China.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.