Incentive spirometry and positive expiratory pressure improve ventilation and recruitment in postoperative recovery: A randomized crossover study

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Impairment of global and regional pulmonary ventilations is a well-known consequence of general anesthesia. Positive expiratory pressure (PEP) or incentive spirometry (IS) is commonly prescribed, albeit their efficacy is poorly demonstrated. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of PEP and IS on lung ventilation and recruitment in patients after surgery involving anesthesia using electrical impedance tomography (EIT). Method: Ten male subjects (age = 61.2 ± 16.3 years; BMI = 25.3 ± 3.8 kg/m²), free of pulmonary disease before being anesthetized, were recruited. Two series of manoeuvers (PEP and volume-oriented IS) were randomly performed with quiet breathing interposed between these phases. Pulmonary ventilation (ΔEELVVT (i − e)) and recruitment (ΔEELI) were evaluated continuously in a semi-seated position during all phases by EIT. Comparisons between rest and treatment were performed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Rest phases were compared by a mixed ANOVA. Bonferroni method was used for post-hoc comparisons. Results: ΔEELVVT (i − e) and ΔEELI were significantly increased by both techniques (+422% [p < 0.001]; +138% [p = 0.040] and +296% [p < 0.001]; +638% [p < 0.001] for PEP and IS, respectively). No difference was observed between both manoeuvers neither on ventilation nor on recruitment. This positive effect disappeared during the quiet breathing phases. Conclusion: IS and PEP improved ventilation and recruitment instantaneously without remnant effect after stopping the exercise.

KEYWORDS:

• Physical therapy modalities
• incentive spirometry
• positive expiratory pressure
• physiotherapy
• anesthesia
• electrical impedance tomography

Declaration of Interest

No conflict of interest is reported.