Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 37, 2021 - Issue 9
447
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Report

Interval aerobic exercise in individuals with advanced interstitial lung disease: a feasibility study

, PT, PhD, , PT, PhDORCID Icon, , MDORCID Icon, , PT, PhDORCID Icon, , MD, , MD & , PT, PhDORCID Icon show all
Pages 1034-1042 | Received 28 Nov 2018, Accepted 09 Sep 2019, Published online: 18 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Aerobic exercise is used in the rehabilitation setting in people with interstitial lung disease (ILD), however little is known about interval exercise as a training strategy. The aim of this study was to compare the cardiorespiratory responses and preferences of a single bout of interval exercise with continuous exercise in individuals with advanced ILD. Methods: Peak work (Wpeak) was obtained from a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). The total volume of prescribed exercise was matched between a bout of interval cycling (alternating 30 seconds at 100% of Wpeak: 30 seconds total rest × 20 min) and continuous cycling (50% of Wpeak × 20 min). Results: Nine lung transplant candidates with ILD were included: 4 men; 62 (6) years; forced vital capacity (FVC) 60% of predicted; and all using supplemental oxygen. Eight (89%) participants reported a preference for interval exercise and one reported no preference (p = .01). One participant required two unintended breaks during continuous exercise. There were no large differences between interval and continuous exercise although some trends emerged. Interval exercise resulted in a lower peak heart rate (124 (12) vs. 132 (15), p = .04) and a trend toward less oxygen desaturation (drop of 8 (4)% vs. 11 (5)%, p = .05) and lower end-exercise Borg leg fatigue (3.8 (2) vs. 4.4 (2), p = .05). End-exercise dyspnea was similar between both exercise modes. Conclusions: Interval exercise was well tolerated and preferred by participants with advanced ILD.

Declaration of interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Ontario Respiratory Care Society;

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.