208
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Serum biomarkers for monitoring response to tuberculosis treatment: an assessment of the effect of different covariates among slow and fast treatment responders

, , &
Pages 466-476 | Received 14 Oct 2022, Accepted 01 May 2023, Published online: 21 May 2023
 

Abstract

Introduction

The long duration of tuberculosis treatment, as well as the 2-year post-treatment follow-up period often required for predicting relapse, present a hindrance to drug development and treatment monitoring efforts. Therefore, there is need for treatment response biomarkers to inform treatment time shortening, clinical decision-making, and inform clinical trials.

Objectives

To assess the abilities of serum host biomarkers to predict treatment response among active PTB patients.

Methods

Active pulmonary TB patients (n = 53) as confirmed by sputum MGIT culture were enrolled at a TB treatment centre in Kampala, Uganda. We evaluated concentrations of 27 serum host biomarkers at baseline, month 2, and month 6 following the initiation of anti-tuberculosis treatment using the luminex platform for their ability to predict sputum culture status at month-2 post treatment initiation.

Results

There were significant differences in concentrations of IL1ra, IL1β, IL6, IP10, MCP-1, and IFNγ during treatment. A bio-signature comprising TTP, TNFα, PDGF-BB, IL9, and GCSF best predicted month 2 culture conversion with sensitivity and specificity of 82% (95% CI; 66 -92% and 57 -96% respectively). Slow anti-TB treatment responders had higher pro-inflammatory marker levels during treatment. The strongest correlation was observed between VEGF and IL12p70 (0.94), IL17A and basic FGF (0.92), basic FGF, and IL2 (0.88), and IL10 with IL17A (0.87).

Conclusion

We identified host biomarkers that predicted early response to PTB treatment, which may be valuable in future clinical trials and treatment monitoring. Similarly, strong correlations between biomarkers provide options for biomarkers substitutions during the development of treatment response monitoring tools or point of care tests.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the study participants for the ScreenTB study, Dr. Mary Nsereko and the clinic, records, and data staff at the Uganda-Case Western Research Collaboration clinic for participant management. We also acknowledge Sophie Nalukwago, Paul Mutumba, Immaculate Kemigisha, Henry Ojiambo from the Uganda Case Western Research Collaboration Immunology lab, and all Mycobacteriology lab staff from the Joint Clinical Research Centre – Uganda for laboratory analysis and mycobacteriology assays for the study. We also acknowledge Prof. Martin Kidd from the Department of Statistics and the Actuarial Sciences University of Stellenbosch, Cape Town, South Africa for advanced statistical analysis.

Ethical approval

The study and the methods were performed following the relevant guidelines and regulations and received ethical approval from Makerere University, College of Health Sciences (Mak-CHS) (SBS 373), the Joint Clinical Research Centre (JCRC) institutional review boards, and the Uganda National Council of Science and Technology (UNCST) (HS2120). All subjects gave informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

AR Namuganga designed this sub-study, performed laboratory sample analysis, initial statistical analysis, original drafting, and revision of the manuscript, while Bernard Bagaya, Harriet Mayanja-Kizza, Novel Chegou supervised the study and revised the manuscript until submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the corresponding author, without undue reservation upon request.

Additional information

Funding

This study was funded as part of the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnerships (EDCTP2) program, supported by the European Union grant number DRIA2014-311-ScreenTB. AR Namuganga acknowledges support from the Organisation for Women in Science from Developing Countries (OWSD) and NN Chegou acknowledges support from the EDCTP through a Senior Fellowship, grant number TMA2018SF-2470-TBMBIOMARKERS. The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the EDCTP.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 527.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.