Does left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiogram predict adverse outcomes in pregnancies with chronic hypertension?

Abstract

Objectives: The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy recommends assessing left ventricular function with echocardiogram or electrocardiogram (ECG) in women with severe hypertension of long duration. We aim to compare the rates of superimposed preeclampsia (SIP) and other obstetrical outcomes in pregnancies with chronic hypertension (CHTN) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) by ECG criteria with mothers without LVH.

Study design: After IRB approval, we performed a retrospective chart review from January 2015 to December 2016. Singleton pregnancies with CHTN who carried the pregnancy beyond 20 weeks and planned to deliver at our institution were included for analysis. Patients with insufficient data, multiple gestations, and those with systemic lupus erythematosus were excluded from this study. Rates of SIP and other obstetrical outcomes were compared among those with LVH and those without LVH. Univariate parametric and nonparametric statistical models were applied as appropriate. Associations were considered statistically significant at an alpha level of 0.05.

Results: We included 218 pregnancies. Nineteen (8.7%) had LVH. The rate of SIP was higher in pregnancies with LVH than in those without it (68 versus 41%; OR = 3.01; 95% CI 1.1–8.5; p = .022). The birthweight was lower in the LVH group (2432 g [2120–2990] versus 2870 g [2430–3440]; p = .016). Other obstetrical outcomes were not significantly different between those patients with LVH and those without.

Conclusions: LVH by ECG criteria may be associated with higher rates of SIP and with lower birthweight in pregnancies with CHTN. ECG may be a cost-effective tool to identify patients with CHTN at risk of adverse outcomes. Larger trials are necessary to corroborate our findings.

Keywords:

• Birthweight
• ECG
• ECG in pregnancy
• preeclampsia
• superimposed preeclampsia

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.