119
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Mismatch response in preterm and asphyxic neonates: a functional electrophysiological investigation of attention and habituation

, , , , &
Pages 5864-5871 | Received 27 Jan 2020, Accepted 03 Mar 2021, Published online: 17 Mar 2021
 

Abstract

Background and Aim

There is a lack of diagnostic tools for early risk stratification of cognitive outcome in infants born preterm and infants with asphyxia. Using auditory event-related potentials and mismatch response, we aimed to assess possible differences in early attention and learning, as a marker for brain maturation to subsequently improve the allocation of early neurodevelopmental support.

Study Design and Methods

This cross-sectional study included 22 very preterm infants (gestational age (GA) < 32 weeks), eight term infants with asphyxia and 35 healthy term infants. An auditory oddball-paradigm with three consecutive stimulation blocks, separated by a two-minute break, was used as a cognitive discrimination task to assess attention and habituation.

Results

The peak-to-peak analysis in the group comparisons showed no significant differences for the first stimulation block. In term healthy infants and term infants after asphyxia, no significant differences were found in amplitudes between block one and three. Preterm infants showed significantly (p = .007) lower amplitudes in the third block for F7 congruent to a positive habituation. The amplitude of the grouped electrodes correlated positively with GA for frontal (R = .271, p= .029) and parietal electrodes (R =.275, p = .027).

Conclusion

We found no differences in the auditory attention paradigm between preterm or term asphyxic and control infants when they were evaluated at term corrected age. Most infants did not show any electrophysiologically measurable learning effect indicating habituation or dishabituation. The small sample size of this study is a clear limitation. Therefore, the results must be evaluated with caution, especially regarding their potential predictive value for future cognitive development of infants with a developmental risk. However, our study underlines the possibility of an electrophysiological evaluation as a feasible tool to assess very early cognition in infants.

Acknowledgements and funding

We would like to thank all the participants and their parents for taking part in this study.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The study was funded by the Hirt-Martin Foundation in Basel, Switzerland and we declare that no involvement such as on the study design, the data, the writing nor the publication.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.