162
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The efficacy of therapeutic cervical cerclage in singleton pregnancies: a retrospective study

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 6267-6271 | Received 21 May 2020, Accepted 26 Mar 2021, Published online: 11 Apr 2021
 

Abstract

Objectives

We compared the pregnancy prolongation effect attributable to cervical cerclage to that achieved by conservative management, and determined the cervical length for which cervical cerclage is effective.

Methods

We retrospectively examined medical records of 281 women admitted to our hospital between January 2013 and December 2017 for management of threatened preterm birth at 22−28 weeks of gestation. Obstetricians determined suitability for cervical cerclage, which was performed using the McDonald procedure in all cases. Of the 281 subjects, 71 underwent cervical cerclage (cerclage group); the other 210 received conservative therapy (non-cerclage group). We recorded maternal and neonatal characteristics of all patients. The two groups were compared in terms of length of extension of pregnancy and weeks of gestation at delivery. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with extension of time to delivery.

Results

Our analyses revealed that the cerclage group was hospitalized earlier in pregnancy than the non-cerclage group (23.7 ± 1.5 weeks vs. 26.4 ± 1.9 weeks, p < .001) and had shorter cervixes (6.0 ± 9.4 mm vs. 16.9 ± 13.0 mm, p < .001). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of gestational weeks at delivery. Multivariate analysis regarding extension of pregnancy revealed significant differences in extension of pregnancy related with cervical cerclage (26.65 days, 95% CI 17.0 − 36.3, p < .001) and cervical length <10 mm (−27.4 days, 95% CI −36.0–−18.8, p < .001). While the time to delivery was extended by cervical cerclage in women with short cervixes (<25 mm), the two groups did not differ when cervical length was ≥15 mm.

Conclusions

Cervical cerclage was a significant positive factor and short cervix was a significant negative factor for elongating pregnancy. In primigravida and multigravida women with no history of preterm birth, when the cervix is short (<10 mm), cervical cerclage should be recommended.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Editage (https://www.editage.com/) for English-language editing. The authors thank Atsushi Kubo to support data collection from the medical record.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

Additional information

Funding

This research was funded by Japanese Red Cross, Nagoya 1st. Hospital Research Grant. The funding body played no role in study design, data collection, analysis or interpretation and writing of the manuscript.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.