214
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Development and evaluation of a novel method “bilirubin color card” for screening of treatable jaundice in neonates: prospective comparative diagnostic study

, , , , &
Pages 9830-9833 | Received 27 Jan 2022, Accepted 18 Mar 2022, Published online: 29 Mar 2022
 

Abstract

Background

Various methods of screening or diagnosis of severe hyperbilirubinemia like transcutaneous bilirubinometer and laboratory testing havemethodological or practical limitations. In this perspective, we designed and evaluated an invasive but simple screening Color Card method in rapid assessment of various levels of bilirubin categories.

Objective

This prospective comparative diagnostic study objectives were to create “Color Card” initially by yellow color shades that fall into 4 bilirubin categories, i.e. TSB up to 7 mg/dl, 7.1 to 12 mg/dl, 12.1 to 18 mg/dl and >18 mg/dl from the samples analyzed by diazo method, and to study its sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of moderate or severe hyperbilirubinemia in comparison to total serum bilirubin (TSB) by diazo method.

Results

Out of total 188 samples obtained, 134 were unique patients. The specificity, negative predictive value and accuracy of the color card for the observations made by observer 1 comparing with lab TSB were >95% for clinically important categories of <7 mg/dl and >18 mg/dl. The overall accuracy of color card in measuring various TSB ranges varied from 75% to 96.8%. The agreement between two observers was 85.6% (Cohen’s kappa co-efficient: 0.61, p-value: .0001) overall and was 92.3%, 86%, 84%, 81.2% for each of the four bilirubin categories in ascending order.

Conclusion

Bilirubin color card has good accuracy and may be very useful in the low resource settings, especially in the first referral units and community settings, where laboratory TSB estimation is not available easily. However, it requires centrifugation and easier methods of centrifugation will make this method simpler.

Author contributions

Concept of the study: SM; Design of study: SM, SS; Data Acquisition: AS, AM; Analysis: SM, VV, SS; Drafting of the work: AS, VV, SM, DS; Critical review of the manuscript: VV, SM, DS.

Ethics approval

IRB approval was obtained, and written informed consent was provided by all parents.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.