83
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

High SVR rate following retreatment of non-sustained virological responders to sofosbuvir based anti-HCV therapies regardless of RAS testing: A real-life multicenter study

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 907-914 | Received 13 Feb 2019, Accepted 05 Jun 2019, Published online: 23 Jun 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Aim: Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir/ribavirin (SOF/DCV/RBV) in treating non-sustained virological responders (non-SVR12) to prior sofosbuvir-based therapy, in absence of RAS testing in mass treatment, and determination of the optimal timing to start re-treatment.

Methods: Real-life prospective observational study included prior non-responders to 24-weeks SOF-RBV (n = 679, 67%) or 12-weeks SOF- RBV- PEG (n = 335, 33%). Patients were re-treated with daily SOF/DCV/RBV for 12 (n = 270) or 24 weeks (n = 744). The primary efficacy endpoint was SVR12. The primary safety endpoints were reported adverse events (AEs) from baseline to SVR12 time point.

Results: We included 1,014 patients [age 52 ± 9 years, 58.48% men]. Cirrhosis was documented in 46.98% and 27.5% of SOF-RBV and SOF-RBV-PEG non-responders respectively. Overall, SVR12 was 90.6% [92.2% for 12 weeks therapy and 90.05% for 24 weeks therapy]. Mild AEs occurred in 5.13% (n=52) and 3.1% (n=32) discontinued treatment including eight on-treatment mortalities. Higher baseline FIB-4 and shorter interval before starting retreatment (<6 months) were independent predictors of non-SVR12 on multivariate regression analysis.

Conclusion: SOF/DCV/RBV is an effective and safe treatment option for non-responders to prior sofosbuvir-based therapy. Six months interval before retreatment is optimal for achieving favorable SVR.

Author contributions

All authors supervised patients’ treatment and follow up. Mohamed Abd Allah collected patient data. Wafaa ElAkel and Heba Omar performed statistical analysis. Samar Darwesh, Maissa El Raziky, Wafaa El Akel, Heba Omar drafted the manuscript, Imam Waked revised and edited the manuscript. Gamal Esmat and Imam Waked are responsible for the overall content as guarantor. All authors revised and approved the final version.

Declaration of interest

W. Doss has served as an investigator and speaker for Gilead Sciences. G. Esmat has served as an investigator, speaker or advisory board member for Abbvie, Gilead Sciences, Marcyrl, Pharco and Roche. I. Waked has served as an investigator, speaker or advisory board member for Abbvie, Eva Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Marcyrl, Onxio, Pharco and Roche. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Reviewer disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial or other relationships to disclose.

Supplementary material

Supplemental data for this article can be accessed here

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 602.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.