463
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Education andPractice

Disaster Training for Prehospital Providers

, RN, BSN, , BS, EMT-Basic, , MA, , MD & , DO
Pages 458-465 | Received 25 Sep 2006, Accepted 05 Jun 2007, Published online: 02 Jul 2009
 

Abstract

Objective. To survey prehospital providers to determine 1) the quantity andformat of training recalled over the past year in chemical, biological, radiological/nuclear (CBRN), andother mass casualty events (MCEs); 2) preferred educational formats; 3) self-assessed preparedness for various CBRN/MCEs; and4) perceived likelihood of occurrence for CBRN/MCEs. Methods. A survey, consisting of 11 questions, was distributed to 1,010 prehospital providers in a system where no formal CBRN/mass casualty training was given. Results. Surveys were completed by 640 (63%) prehospital providers. Twenty-two percent (22%) of prehospital providers recalled no training within the past year for CBRN or other MCEs, 19% reported 1–5 hours, 15% reported 6–10 hours, 24% reported 11–39 hours, and7% reported receiving greater than 40 hours. Lectures anddrills were the most common formats for prior education. On a five-point scale (1: “Never Helpful” through 5: “Always Helpful”) regarding the helpfulness of training methods, median scores were the following: drills–5, lectures–4, self-study packets–3, Web-based learning–3, andother–4. On another five-point scale (1: “Totally Unprepared” through 5: “Strongly Prepared”), prehospital providers felt most prepared for MCEs–4, followed by chemical–4, biological–3, andradiation/nuclear–3. Over half (61%) felt MCEs were “Somewhat Likely” or “Very Likely” to occur, whereas chemical (42%), biological (38%), or radiation/nuclear (33%) rated lower. Conclusion. The amount of training in the past year reported for CBRN events varied greatly, with almost a quarter recalling no education. Drills andlectures were the most used andpreferred formats for disaster training. Prehospital providers felt least prepared for a radiological;/nuclear event. Future studies should focus on the consistency andquality of education provided.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 85.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.