Figures & data
Table 1. Characteristics of the nine studies included in the systematic review.
Bracero, L.A., 1997. Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefotetan for the prevention of infection following caesarean delivery in high-risk patients: a randomized double-blind trial. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 44 (1), 21–25. Noyes, N., et al., 1998. Incidence of postpartum endomyometritis following single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis with either ampicillin/sulbactam, cefazolin, or cefotetan in high-risk caesarean section patients. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6 (5), 220–223. Spinnato, J.A., et al., 2000. Antibiotic prophylaxis at caesarean delivery. Journal of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, 9 (6), 348–350. Busowski, J.D., et al., 2000. Antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean delivery: a randomized trial of cefotetan, ampicillin-sulbactam and ciprofloxacin. Prenatal and Neonatal Medicine, 5, 357–362. Ziogos, E., et al., 2010. Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefuroxime as antimicrobial prophylaxis for caesarean delivery: a randomized study. BMC Infectious Disease, 10, 341. Jyothi, S., et al., 2010. Antibiotic prophylaxis for hysterectomy and caesarean section: amoxicillin-clavulanic acid versus cefazolin. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 60 (5), 419–423. Mivumbi, V.N., et al., 2014. Prophylactic ampicillin versus cefazolin for the prevention of post-caesarean infectious morbidity in Rwanda. International Journal of Gynaecology & Obstetrics, 124 (3), 244–247. Zhang, X.J., et al., 2010. Resonable selection of antibiotics during perioperative period in caesarean section. Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 26 (2), 128–130. Fang, C.F., 2021. Study on the effect of cefuroxime sodium in anti infection treatment of caesarean section. Capital Food Medicine, 28 (8), 74–76. Data availability statement
All data in relation to this study are presented in this manuscript.