2,033
Views
54
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Microwave ablation of primary and secondary liver tumours: ex vivo, in vivo, and clinical characterisation

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 34-42 | Received 29 Feb 2016, Accepted 30 May 2016, Published online: 25 Jul 2016

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flowchart summarising the steps of the study.

Figure 1. Flowchart summarising the steps of the study.

Table 1. Microwave ablation zone sizes in ex vivo bovine liver for different combinations of treatment power and duration.

Figure 2. Ex vivo ablation diameter (upper graph) and sphericity (lower graph) for different power settings and ablation times. The lines in Figure 2a represent the best cubic root fit of the data. The lines in Figure 2b are guides for the eye.

Figure 2. Ex vivo ablation diameter (upper graph) and sphericity (lower graph) for different power settings and ablation times. The lines in Figure 2a represent the best cubic root fit of the data. The lines in Figure 2b are guides for the eye.

Figure 3. Ex vivo ablation volume as a function of the deposited energy. The black line is the best linear fit.

Figure 3. Ex vivo ablation volume as a function of the deposited energy. The black line is the best linear fit.

Figure 4. Ablation diameters (upper graph) and sphericity (lower graph) following treatments at 60 W for either 5 or 10 min in liver metastases, ex vivo bovine liver, hepatocellular carcinomas and in vivo porcine liver.

Figure 4. Ablation diameters (upper graph) and sphericity (lower graph) following treatments at 60 W for either 5 or 10 min in liver metastases, ex vivo bovine liver, hepatocellular carcinomas and in vivo porcine liver.

Figure 5. Graphical comparison of the average ablation zones (sectioned along the applicator shaft) obtained upon treatments performed at 60 W for either 5 min (left) or 10 min (right) in HCC, liver metastases, in vivo porcine liver and ex vivo bovine liver.

Figure 5. Graphical comparison of the average ablation zones (sectioned along the applicator shaft) obtained upon treatments performed at 60 W for either 5 min (left) or 10 min (right) in HCC, liver metastases, in vivo porcine liver and ex vivo bovine liver.

Table 2. Microwave ablation zone sizes for different treatment power and time settings in in vivo porcine liver.

Table 3. Average microwave ablation zone sizes in patients with HCC or liver metastases treated at 60 W for either 5 or 10 min.

Table 4. Percentage variations of the ablation volume V, sphericity S, diameter D and length L of the three in vivo (IN) experiments compared to ex vivo (EX) results. Each percentage variation was calculated as 100×(IN-EX)/EX. Below each percentage variation the corresponding p-value is reported to assess the significance of the variation.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.