![Sample our Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing & Allied Health journals, sign in here to start your FREE access for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5944/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Medicine-Dentistry-Nursing-Allied-Health.jpg"})
Abstract
Radiosurgery is increasingly employed in the treatment of acoustic neuroma, but the optimal dose in terms of long-term tumour control and minimal adverse effects has not been established. We performed a systematic review of the published literature of radiosurgery of acoustic neuroma to assess whether the use of low dose radiosurgery is as effective as high dose treatment. Reports of radiosurgery for acoustic neuroma were identified through a Medline search. Studies with at least 15 patients and a median follow-up longer than 12 months were included. The relationship between actuarial 5-year progression-free survival (PFS), and tumour and treatment parameters was examined. Forty-two studies were included. Tumour control following lower radiosurgery doses was similar to that reported following high doses. Only 12 studies reported actuarial outcomes at 5 years. There was no relationship between PFS at 5 years and dose to the tumour margin. Radiosurgery of larger tumours was associated with lower 5 year PFS (p < 0.05). Although on initial inspection radiosurgery of acoustic neuroma with doses of 12 – 13 Gy seems to be as effective as higher dose treatment, the available reports are subject to a number of confounding factors, are not sufficiently statistically powered and there is only limited long-term actuarial outcome data. Currently, available studies do not provide sufficient confidence to support the claim that low dose radiosurgery is equally effective as higher doses in the long-term control of acoustic neuroma.