556
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

General effect on high-risk persons when general practitioners are trained in intensive treatment of type 2 diabetes

, , , &
Pages 166-173 | Received 02 Jul 2008, Published online: 12 Jul 2009

Figures & data

Figure 1.  The ADDITION study design at the general practice level. Note: Number of practice refers to the population with IFG or IGT. Eight practices in the standard group and two in the intervention group dropped out of the study between screening and follow-up visits.

Figure 1.  The ADDITION study design at the general practice level. Note: Number of practice refers to the population with IFG or IGT. Eight practices in the standard group and two in the intervention group dropped out of the study between screening and follow-up visits.

Figure 2.  Attendance at the follow-up visits of individuals with IFG or IGT in the ADDITION study, Denmark. Note: Fasting and two-hour blood glucose were measured at all follow-up visits. The three-year visit (or at study end for those more recently screened) was extended to include anthropometric measurements, blood samples, and a questionnaire with focus on changes in lifestyle since screening. The GP stopped: individuals attending GPs who after randomization stopped participation in the ADDITION study or were unable to do OGTT.

Figure 2.  Attendance at the follow-up visits of individuals with IFG or IGT in the ADDITION study, Denmark. Note: Fasting and two-hour blood glucose were measured at all follow-up visits. The three-year visit (or at study end for those more recently screened) was extended to include anthropometric measurements, blood samples, and a questionnaire with focus on changes in lifestyle since screening. The GP stopped: individuals attending GPs who after randomization stopped participation in the ADDITION study or were unable to do OGTT.

Table I.  Progression rates and baseline characteristics of individuals with IFG or IGT in the standard and intervention groups.

Table II.  Change in risk-factor level in individuals with IFG or IGT: Absolute intra-individual change in the standard and intervention groups, difference in rate of change per observation time, and difference in change after one year.

Table III.  Proportions of persons who reported change in habits from screening to follow-up in the standard and intervention groups for individuals with IFG or IGT.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.