1,513
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premonopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer: Indirect comparison of dose and schedule in DBCG trials 77, 82, and 89

, &
Pages 662-671 | Received 03 Jul 2007, Published online: 08 Jul 2009

Figures & data

Table I.  Patient characteristics.

Figure 1.  Disease-free survival (DFS) comparison between the 77 and 82 programs (Panel A) and the 77 and 89 programs (Panel B).

Figure 1.  Disease-free survival (DFS) comparison between the 77 and 82 programs (Panel A) and the 77 and 89 programs (Panel B).

Table II.  End-points.

Figure 2.  Overall survival (OS) comparison between the 77 and 82 programs (Panel A) and between the 77 and 89 programs (Panel B).

Figure 2.  Overall survival (OS) comparison between the 77 and 82 programs (Panel A) and between the 77 and 89 programs (Panel B).

Figure 3.  Forest plots illustrating proportional hazard models for DFS comparison between the 77 and 82 programs (Panel A) and between the 77 and 89 programs (Panel B). Hazard ratios refer to adjusted per protocol estimates obtained in the multivariate analysis.

Figure 3.  Forest plots illustrating proportional hazard models for DFS comparison between the 77 and 82 programs (Panel A) and between the 77 and 89 programs (Panel B). Hazard ratios refer to adjusted per protocol estimates obtained in the multivariate analysis.

Figure 4.  Forest plots illustrating proportional hazard models for OS comparison between the 77 and 82 programs (Panel A) and between the 77 and 89 programs (Panel B). Hazard ratios refer to adjusted per protocol estimates obtained in the multivariate analysis.

Figure 4.  Forest plots illustrating proportional hazard models for OS comparison between the 77 and 82 programs (Panel A) and between the 77 and 89 programs (Panel B). Hazard ratios refer to adjusted per protocol estimates obtained in the multivariate analysis.

Figure 5.  Delivered dose-intensity of cyclophosphamide (Panel A), methotrexate (Panel B) and fluorouracil (Panel C) (weekly dose in mg/m2) in the 77 (•) 82 (▪) and 89 (▴) programs.

Figure 5.  Delivered dose-intensity of cyclophosphamide (Panel A), methotrexate (Panel B) and fluorouracil (Panel C) (weekly dose in mg/m2) in the 77 (•) 82 (▪) and 89 (▴) programs.

Table III.  Treatment-related adverse effects (Modified WHO criteria).

Table IV.  Planned dose-intensity.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.