Flipped microlecture classes: satisfied learners and higher performance?

Figures & data

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the experimental setup and data collection moments.

Table 1. Shapiro-Wilk normality test.

Condition	Pretest		Post-test
	Statistic	Significance	Statistic	Significance
Traditional (control, n = 12, 10)^a	0,915	0,351	0,954	0,733
Micro (experiment, n = 13, 12)^a	0,811	0,013*	0,929	0,371

^aNumber of participants in the pretest and post-test.

Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the pre-post test scores.

Condition	Pretest		Post-test
	Mean	Var	Mean	Var
Control, (n = 12, 10)^a	4,1108	1,600	5,3770	2,792
Experiment, (n = 13, 12)^a	4,8200	1,568	6,8250	0,814

^aNumber of participants in the pretest and post-test.

Table

https://vimeo.com/298123819/76a354ab76	[inter-operability]
https://vimeo.com/298123781/2c92ba52dc	[open data structures]
https://vimeo.com/298123757/10e13a94e8	[open versus closed BIM]
https://vimeo.com/298123720/e58e865cbf	[viewing BIM data]
https://vimeo.com/298123678/1036e21e58	[linking BIM]