Publication Cover
Chronobiology International
The Journal of Biological and Medical Rhythm Research
Volume 35, 2018 - Issue 2
5,838
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Shift work and sleep disorder comorbidity tend to go hand in hand

Figures & data

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics (mean, SD: standard deviation) of day workers and shift workers, within the age range of 21–60 years, and drawn from a representative sample of 2089 persons. Data as indicated in first column. Pairwise comparisons were made using Pearson χ2, t-test or Mann–Whitney U-statistic.

Table 2. Mean (SD) scores for 12 sleep-related variables (range of variation), classified into 4 clusters.

Table 3. Prevalence rates (95% Confidence interval). Asterisk (column 3) indicates a significant outcome of a Pearson χ2-test for shift workers versus day workers, respectively, for age (column 4; p < .05). Column 4: D = Day work, S = Shift work.

Figure 1. Prevalence rates of a general sleep disturbance among day workers and shift workers versus age. Error bars: 95% confidence intervals. Numbers of day workers versus shift workers for the four age groups were respectively: 191 versus 67, 259 versus 61, 307 versus 68, 214 versus 53.

Figure 1. Prevalence rates of a general sleep disturbance among day workers and shift workers versus age. Error bars: 95% confidence intervals. Numbers of day workers versus shift workers for the four age groups were respectively: 191 versus 67, 259 versus 61, 307 versus 68, 214 versus 53.

Figure 2. Prevalence rates of a general sleep disturbance among single and partnered day workers and shift workers. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Numbers of single versus partnered workers among the day workers and shift workers were, respectively, 202 versus 770 and 77 versus 173.

Figure 2. Prevalence rates of a general sleep disturbance among single and partnered day workers and shift workers. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Numbers of single versus partnered workers among the day workers and shift workers were, respectively, 202 versus 770 and 77 versus 173.