1,561
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Pulmonary Medicine

The prevalence of burnout among pulmonologists or respiratory therapists pre- and post-COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2234392 | Received 30 May 2023, Accepted 04 Jul 2023, Published online: 17 Jul 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. PRISMA flow of study selection. A total of 2859 records were identified from PubMed (n = 422), EMBASE (n = 820), PsycINFO (n = 77), CENTRAL (n = 27), Scopus (n = 432) and Web of Science (n = 1081). There were 1088 duplicates removed. The remaining 1771 records went through title-and-abstract reviews. We excluded 1662 records due to reasons presented in the figure. Therefore, 109 records were further evaluated by full-text reviews. Ninety-four were excluded because of reasons in the above column. One additional paper was found by screening the reference lists of the included studies. Thus, 16 studies were included in the final analysis.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow of study selection. A total of 2859 records were identified from PubMed (n = 422), EMBASE (n = 820), PsycINFO (n = 77), CENTRAL (n = 27), Scopus (n = 432) and Web of Science (n = 1081). There were 1088 duplicates removed. The remaining 1771 records went through title-and-abstract reviews. We excluded 1662 records due to reasons presented in the figure. Therefore, 109 records were further evaluated by full-text reviews. Ninety-four were excluded because of reasons in the above column. One additional paper was found by screening the reference lists of the included studies. Thus, 16 studies were included in the final analysis.

Table 1. Information of the included studies (n = 16).

Table 2. The measure, definition and prevalence of burnout of the included studies (n = 16).

Figure 2. Forest plot of the overall prevalence of burnout. The included studies reported a total of 3610 responding individuals and 2100 burnouts. The pooled prevalence of burnout was 61.7% (95% CI, 48.6–73.2%; I2 = 96.3%). The pooled prevalence of burnout during COVID-19 was significantly higher than it was prior to the outbreak (68.4% vs. 41.6%, p = .01).

Figure 2. Forest plot of the overall prevalence of burnout. The included studies reported a total of 3610 responding individuals and 2100 burnouts. The pooled prevalence of burnout was 61.7% (95% CI, 48.6–73.2%; I2 = 96.3%). The pooled prevalence of burnout during COVID-19 was significantly higher than it was prior to the outbreak (68.4% vs. 41.6%, p = .01).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download MS Excel (9.3 KB)

Supplemental Material

Download MS Excel (10.9 KB)

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.