2,149
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Bowel health, defecation patterns and nutrient intake following adoption of a vegan diet: a randomized-controlled trial

, , , , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2305693 | Received 28 Sep 2023, Accepted 10 Jan 2024, Published online: 07 Feb 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. Course of the study: a schematic overview. BSFS: Bristol Stool Form Scale; GLQI: Gastrointestinal Life Quality Index; CCFIS: Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score; IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire; MASS: MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status.

Figure 1. Course of the study: a schematic overview. BSFS: Bristol Stool Form Scale; GLQI: Gastrointestinal Life Quality Index; CCFIS: Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score; IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire; MASS: MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status.

Figure 2. Participant inclusion flowchart.

Figure 2. Participant inclusion flowchart.

Table 1. Sample characteristics including sociodemographic, anthropometric and physical activity data at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of the dietary intervention.

Table 2. Bowel movement frequency, defecation patterns and gastrointestinal life quality at baseline, after 4 weeks and after 8 weeks of the dietary intervention.

Table 3. Nutrient intakes at baseline and after 8 weeks of the dietary intervention.

Figure 3. Macronutrient profile in both groups before and after the intervention. Stripplot showing macronutrient profiles for both groups at baseline (top) and after eight weeks (bottom). MD: Meat-rich diet; VD: Vegan diet.

Figure 3. Macronutrient profile in both groups before and after the intervention. Stripplot showing macronutrient profiles for both groups at baseline (top) and after eight weeks (bottom). MD: Meat-rich diet; VD: Vegan diet.

Table 4. Intakes of selected food groups related to bowel health and dietary group at baseline and after 8 weeks of the dietary intervention.

Figure 4. Scatterplots visualizing the relationship between BM frequency and fiber intake (top) and GIQLI and fiber intake (bottom). BM: Bowel Movement; GIQLI: Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. One outlier (fiber intake per day: 120 g) in the vegan group was removed to highlight full cohort behavior over the casuality of one outlier. Spearman’s rho for fiber intake and GIQLI was 0.27 (p = .03), whereas it was not significant for fiber and BM frequency.

Figure 4. Scatterplots visualizing the relationship between BM frequency and fiber intake (top) and GIQLI and fiber intake (bottom). BM: Bowel Movement; GIQLI: Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. One outlier (fiber intake per day: 120 g) in the vegan group was removed to highlight full cohort behavior over the casuality of one outlier. Spearman’s rho for fiber intake and GIQLI was 0.27 (p = .03), whereas it was not significant for fiber and BM frequency.

Table 5. Comparison of BM frequency, BSFS, and GIQLI across dietary groups.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (926.9 KB)

Data availability statement

The datasets used and analyzed for the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.