Prognosis of urgent initiation of peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Figures & data

Figure 1. Search methodology and selection process.

Table 1. Characteristics of included trials.

Study	Patients location	Design	Insertion technique	Mean age follow-up time		Exposure versus control	Outcome
Mendes [18] 2022	171 Brazil	Prospective cohort	surgical	48(m)	≤7d >7d		Catheter-related complications, Patient outcomes (death, transfer to HD)
Ng [19] 2022	148 USA	Retrospective cohort	surgical	12(m)	48–72 h <14d ≥14d		Catheter-related complications, Patient outcomes (death)
Chen [20] 2022	437 China	Retrospective cohort	surgical	36(m)	≤7 d 8–13 d ≥14d		Catheter-related complications
Aal [21] 2020	240 USA	Retrospective cohort	Surgical or laparoscopy or percutaneous	12(m)	24–48 h ≥14		catheter-related complications
Wojtaszek [22] 2019	127 Poland	Retrospective cohort	surgical	12(m)	<14 d ≥14 d		Catheter-related complications, Patient outcomes (transfer to HD)
Nayak [8] 2018	56 India	Prospective cohort	Surgical or laparoscopy	3(m)	<14 d ≥14 d		Catheter-related complications
Kim [23] 2018	360 Korea	Retrospective cohort	surgical	6(m)	<48 h 2–13 d ≥14		Catheter-related complications, Patient outcomes (death, transfer to HD)
Silva [24] 2018	154 Brazil	Retrospective cohort	Surgical or laparoscopy	381(d)	<14 d ≥14 d		technique survival comparing, Patient outcomes (transfer to HD)
See [25] 2016	104 Australia	Prospective cohort	laparoscopy	1(m)	<14 d ≥14 d		catheter-related complications
Wong [26] 2016	81 USA	Retrospective cohort	Surgical or laparoscopy	12(m)	<14 d ≥14 d		catheter-related complications
Liu [27] 2013	657 China	Prospective cohort	Surgical	6(m)	≤7 d 8–14 d >14 d		Catheter-related complications
Ghaffari [6] 2012	21USA	Prospective cohort	percutaneous	3(m)	<14 d ≥14 d		Catheter-related complications
Yang [28] 2010	310 China	Prospective cohort	percutaneous	6(m)	<14 d ≥14 d		Catheter-related complications
Sharma [29] 2008	48 Canada	Prospective cohort	Surgical or percutaneous	9(m)	≤7 d ≥14 d		Catheter-related complications
Povlsen [30] 2006	140 Denmark	Prospective cohort	surgical	3(m)	<24 h ≥14 d		Catheter-related complications

Table 2. Quality Assessment sheet.

Study	Bias due to confounding	Bias in selection of participants into the study	Bias in classification of interventions	Bias due to deviations from intended interventions	Bias due to missing data	Bias in measurement of outcomes	Bias in selection of the reported result
Mendes 2022	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Serious risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias
Ng 2022	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
Chen 2022	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias
Aal 2020	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
Wojtaszek 2019	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias
Nayak 2018	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
Kim 2018	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
Silva 2018	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	No information	No information	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
See 2016	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	No information	No information	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
Wong 2016	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	No information	No information	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias
Liu 2013	Moderate risk of bias	Serious risk of bias	No information	No information	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Serious risk of bias
Ghaffari 2012	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
Yang 2010	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
Sharma 2008	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Low risk of bias	Low risk of bias
Povlsen 2006	Serious risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	No information	No information	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias	Moderate risk of bias

Figure 2. Mechanical complications.

Figure 3. Infectious complications.

Mendes ML, Alves CA, Marinho LCR, et al. Unplanned vs. planned peritoneal dialysis as initial therapy for dialysis patients in chronic kidney replacement therapy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(6):1417–1425. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-03029-9.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Ng AKH, Tan SN, Tay ME, et al. Comparison of planned-start, early-start and deferred-start strategies for peritoneal dialysis initiation in end-stage kidney disease. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2022;51(4):213–220. doi: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2021495.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Yifang CHEN, Xiuling CHEN, Hui GAO, et al. Patients initiated peritoneal dialysis within 7 days after peritoneal catheterization. Chin J Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;31(1):33–38.

 Google Scholar

Abdel Aal AK, Mahmoud K, Moustafa AS, et al. Comparative study on the outcomes of Elective-Start versus urgent-start peritoneal dialysis catheter placement. Radiol Res Pract. 2020;2020:3751827. doi: 10.1155/2020/3751827.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Wojtaszek E, Grzejszczak A, Grygiel K, et al. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis as a bridge to definitive chronic renal replacement therapy: short- and long-term outcomes. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1830. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01830.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Nayak KS, Subhramanyam SV, Pavankumar N, et al. Emergent start peritoneal dialysis for End-Stage renal disease: outcomes and advantages. Blood Purif. 2018;45(4):313–319. doi: 10.1159/000486543.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Kim K, Son YK, Lee SM, et al. Early technical complications and long-term survival of urgent peritoneal dialysis according to break-in periods. PLOS One. 2018;13(10):e0206426. Published 2018 Oct 26. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206426.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Silva BC, Adelina E, Pereira BJ, et al. Early start peritoneal dialysis: technique survival in long-term follow-up. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43(6):1699–1705. doi: 10.1159/000495386.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

See EJ, Cho Y, Hawley CM, et al. Early and late patient outcomes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2017;37(4):414–419. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2016.00158.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Wong LP, Li NC, Kansal S, et al. Urgent peritoneal dialysis starts for ESRD: initial multicenter experiences in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(3):500–502. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.426.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Liu Y, Zhang L, Lin A, et al. Impact of break-in period on the short-term outcomes of patients started on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. 2014;34(1):49–56. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2012.00293.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Ghaffari A. Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: a quality improvement report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012;59(3):400–408. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.08.034.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Yang YF, Wang HJ, Yeh CC, et al. Early initiation of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in patients undergoing surgical implantation of tenckhoff catheters. Perit Dial Int. 2011;31(5):551–557. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2009.00171.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Sharma AP, Mandhani A, Daniel SP, et al. Shorter break-in period is a viable option with tighter PD catheter securing during the insertion. Nephrology. 2008;13(8):672–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2008.01000.x.

 PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Povlsen JV, Ivarsen P. How to start the late referred ESRD patient urgently on chronic APD. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(Suppl 2):ii56–59. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl192.

 PubMedGoogle Scholar

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.