An economic evaluation of topical treatments for actinic keratosis

Abstract

Actinic keratoses (AK) commonly occur as lesions, in sun-exposed areas. Various treatment modalities exist for their removal. We assessed the cost-effectiveness in 2007 of topical treatments (5-fluorouracil, imiquimod) and photodynamic therapy with methyl aminolevulinate (MAL-PDT) for AK under the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS) in England and Wales over two lines of treatment. We used a decision tree analytical approach. Efficacy data were taken from published trial literature for two investigator-assessed outcomes: ‘complete clinical response’ and ‘excellent cosmetic outcome’. MAL-PDT at first line followed by various second-line treatments provided the greatest probability of complete clinical response (91.7%), but MAL-PDT at first line followed by further MAL-PDT as the second-line treatment provided the greatest probability of excellent cosmetic outcome (73.6%). The cost of MAL-PDT was £437 after two lines of treatment if MAL-PDT was that second-line treatment or £418 if various treatments were offered at second line. The probabilistic analysis produced consistent results. Based on this model, the costs and effectiveness of MAL-PDT in the UK NHS compare well with other treatments for AK.

• Actinic keratosis
• cost-effectiveness
• decision tree
• 5-fluorouracil
• imiquimod
• MAL-PDT