Abstract
Purpose
Because of their communication difficulties, persons with aphasia are at risk of not fully participating in significant activities after rehabilitation. Speech-language pathologists can contribute to support optimal social participation in rehabilitation. A community of practice (CoP) was designed to provide motivated clinicians with opportunities to acquire knowledge and reflect on social participation within aphasia rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to describe the outcomes of this CoP according to the perspectives of speech-language pathologist participants.
Methods
Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted 4 to 10 weeks after the end of the CoP with 13 speech-language pathologist participants. Analyses were guided by grounded theory.
Results
Participants perceived that the CoP experience contributed to a better alignment of their practice with the ideal end purpose of optimizing social participation. A sense of community emerged among CoP members, who collectively reflected on their practice. Participants stated feeling equipped to adopt new practices, adopting new practices for optimizing social participation, and/or advocating for better services for persons with aphasia. They felt increased confidence, motivation, well-being, and/or energy towards their practice.
Conclusions
CoPs can help speech-language pathologists to more confidently practice with the goal of optimizing the social participation of persons with aphasia.
Speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation, as a result of being involved in a community of practice (CoP) about social participation, may offer more evidence-based services aiming at optimizing the social participation of persons with aphasia.
Markers of a successful CoP may include participants’ increased feelings of confidence, motivation, well-being, and/or energy towards their practice.
CoPs can be used for continuing education purposes and support the development of clinical expertise among professionals, such as speech-language pathologists in aphasia rehabilitation.
Implications for rehabilitation
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge all participants who took part in this study. CAG acknowledges the financial support of the Fonds de recherche du Québec – Société et Culture, the Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal, and Université de Montréal. CAG also wishes to acknowledge the members of her thesis evaluation committee for their insightful input: Professor Pascale Lehoux, Professor Marie-Ève Caty, and Professor Ana Inès Ansaldo.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes
1 CAG translated the extracts when the manuscript was nearing submission. GLD verified the translations by reference to the original French. Occasionally, it was necessary to consult the full transcript.