1,113
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Reliability and validity of the telephone-based version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale for assessing depression in individuals with primary brain tumour

, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1158-1166 | Received 05 Sep 2022, Accepted 09 Mar 2023, Published online: 05 Apr 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Participant Recruitment Flow Chart.

Figure 1. Participant Recruitment Flow Chart.

Table 1. Summary of Participants’ Demographic and Tumour-related Characteristics (n = 50).

Table 2. Descriptive Data and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for the MADRS.

Table 3. Pearson’s Correlations Assessing Associations between the MADRS and Other Measures of Depression and Psychological Distress (95th percentile confidence intervals are shown in brackets).

Table 4. Between Group Comparisons for Demographic and Tumour-Related Characteristics on Depression Symptoms Measured by the MADRS.

Data availability statement

Raw data were generated at Griffith University. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [TO] on request.