Publication Cover
Stress
The International Journal on the Biology of Stress
Volume 8, 2005 - Issue 4
257
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original

Enhanced involvement of brain vasopressin V1 receptors in cardiovascular responses to stress in rats with myocardial infarction

Research Report

, &
Pages 273-284 | Received 26 Jul 2005, Accepted 05 Nov 2005, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

Figures & data

Table I.  Characteristics of sham-operated and infarcted SD rats.

Table II.  infarct Size And Resting Values Of Mabp And Heart Rate In Sham-operated And Infarcted Rats Before Intracerebroventricular Infusion Of Acsf, Vp Or—{d(ch2)5[tyr(me)2ala-]vp} (V1ant).

Figure 1 (A) Comparison of changes in MABP from baseline in the sham-operated and the infarcted (MI) rats during i.c.v infusions of VP V1 receptor antagonist (V1ANT), *—significant differences between the corresponding means in the rats with and without the infarct, #—significant difference from baseline. (B) Changes in resting MABP from baseline during i.c.v. infusion of aCSF, arginine VP and VP V1ANT in the sham-operated (upper part) and the infarcted (MI, lower part) rats. Number of rats in the groups: sham CSF—9, sham VP—8, sham V1ANT—8, infarct CSF—8, infarct VP—8, infarct V1ANT—8. Means ± standard errors are shown. The symbols indicate significant differences between the corresponding means in different groups of experiments:+ − significant difference between aCSF and VP groups, #—significant difference between aCSF and V1ANT groups, *—significant difference between VP and V1ANT groups. The results were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Figure 1 (A) Comparison of changes in MABP from baseline in the sham-operated and the infarcted (MI) rats during i.c.v infusions of VP V1 receptor antagonist (V1ANT), *—significant differences between the corresponding means in the rats with and without the infarct, #—significant difference from baseline. (B) Changes in resting MABP from baseline during i.c.v. infusion of aCSF, arginine VP and VP V1ANT in the sham-operated (upper part) and the infarcted (MI, lower part) rats. Number of rats in the groups: sham CSF—9, sham VP—8, sham V1ANT—8, infarct CSF—8, infarct VP—8, infarct V1ANT—8. Means ± standard errors are shown. The symbols indicate significant differences between the corresponding means in different groups of experiments:+ − significant difference between aCSF and VP groups, #—significant difference between aCSF and V1ANT groups, *—significant difference between VP and V1ANT groups. The results were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Figure 2 Representative tracings of air jet stress-induced MABP and heart rate changes in the sham-operated (left) and the infarcted (MI, right) rats. The rectangle indicates the time of air jet stress application.

Figure 2 Representative tracings of air jet stress-induced MABP and heart rate changes in the sham-operated (left) and the infarcted (MI, right) rats. The rectangle indicates the time of air jet stress application.

Figure 3 Maximum changes in mean arterial pressure (ΔMABPmax) and heart rate in response to the air jet stress in rats with and without the MI subjected to i.c.v. infusions of aCSF, arginine VP or VP V1ANT. Number of rats in the groups: sham CSF—9, sham VP—8, sham V1ANT—8, infarct CSF—8, infarct VP—8, infarct V1ANT—8. Means ± standard errors are shown. *—significant difference from baseline, #—significant difference between the corresponding groups. The results were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Figure 3 Maximum changes in mean arterial pressure (ΔMABPmax) and heart rate in response to the air jet stress in rats with and without the MI subjected to i.c.v. infusions of aCSF, arginine VP or VP V1ANT. Number of rats in the groups: sham CSF—9, sham VP—8, sham V1ANT—8, infarct CSF—8, infarct VP—8, infarct V1ANT—8. Means ± standard errors are shown. *—significant difference from baseline, #—significant difference between the corresponding groups. The results were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Figure 4 The time zero-peak latency between application of air jet stress and MABP and heart rate during i.c.v. infusions of cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), VP and VP V1ANT. Number of rats in the group: sham CSF—9, sham VP—8, sham V1ANT—8, infarct CSF—8, infarct VP—8, infarct V1ANT—8.

Figure 4 The time zero-peak latency between application of air jet stress and MABP and heart rate during i.c.v. infusions of cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), VP and VP V1ANT. Number of rats in the group: sham CSF—9, sham VP—8, sham V1ANT—8, infarct CSF—8, infarct VP—8, infarct V1ANT—8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.