10,305
Views
47
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Effect of Fatigue Training on Safety, Fatigue, and Sleep in Emergency Medical Services Personnel and Other Shift Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pages 58-68 | Received 14 Jul 2017, Published online: 11 Jan 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram for PICO#5 PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016040110.

Figure 1. PRISMA 2009 Flow Diagram for PICO#5 PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016040110.

Table 1. Description of the sleep health and/or fatigue-related education/training intervention/program

Table 2. Synthesis of findings on the impact of fatigue/sleep education and/or training programs on critical and important outcomes

Figure 2. a) Forest Plot (outcome: sleep quality 4–8 weeks post-intervention follow-up fixed effects model. b) Forest Plot (outcome: sleep quality 4–8 weeks post-intervention follow-up random effects model) The figure reports the standardized mean difference (SMD) for sleep quality as measured by the within-group change in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) during the post-intervention follow-up in five studies occurring between 4 and 8 weeks relative to baseline. The SMDs for these studies are the estimated change from baseline relative to the variability in the study and also known as Cohen's d measurement of effect size. The effect size is not tied to a specific scale or scales used in the pooled analysis. An SMD of zero implies there was no change from baseline. An SMD less than zero indicates the outcome at follow up was less than at baseline. Common delineations or cut-points for interpretation include: 0.2 = small; 0.5 = medium/moderate; 0.8 or greater as large. The SMD is non-significant if the corresponding 95% confidence interval is wide and overlaps 0. For the Carter et al. study we used the PSQI measurements at baseline and 5 weeks follow-up Citation(40). For the Chen et al. study, we used the PSQI measurements at baseline and 5 weeks follow-up Citation(11). For the Scott et al. study, we used the PSQI measurements at baseline and 4 weeks follow-up Citation(32). For the Smith et al. study, we used the PSQI measurements at baseline and 8 weeks follow-up Citation(35). For the Lee et al. study, we used the PSQI measurements at baseline (T1) and (T3) 4 weeks after intervention phase follow-up Citation(39). The standard deviations were estimated using the standard deviations from the baseline and follow up measure assuming a positive, moderate correlation between measurements within the same individual: SD for the change = √(SD2 baseline + SD2 follow-up −2*0.5*SDbaseline*SDfollow up).

Figure 2. a) Forest Plot (outcome: sleep quality 4–8 weeks post-intervention follow-up fixed effects model. b) Forest Plot (outcome: sleep quality 4–8 weeks post-intervention follow-up random effects model) The figure reports the standardized mean difference (SMD) for sleep quality as measured by the within-group change in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) during the post-intervention follow-up in five studies occurring between 4 and 8 weeks relative to baseline. The SMDs for these studies are the estimated change from baseline relative to the variability in the study and also known as Cohen's d measurement of effect size. The effect size is not tied to a specific scale or scales used in the pooled analysis. An SMD of zero implies there was no change from baseline. An SMD less than zero indicates the outcome at follow up was less than at baseline. Common delineations or cut-points for interpretation include: 0.2 = small; 0.5 = medium/moderate; 0.8 or greater as large. The SMD is non-significant if the corresponding 95% confidence interval is wide and overlaps 0. For the Carter et al. study we used the PSQI measurements at baseline and 5 weeks follow-up Citation(40). For the Chen et al. study, we used the PSQI measurements at baseline and 5 weeks follow-up Citation(11). For the Scott et al. study, we used the PSQI measurements at baseline and 4 weeks follow-up Citation(32). For the Smith et al. study, we used the PSQI measurements at baseline and 8 weeks follow-up Citation(35). For the Lee et al. study, we used the PSQI measurements at baseline (T1) and (T3) 4 weeks after intervention phase follow-up Citation(39). The standard deviations were estimated using the standard deviations from the baseline and follow up measure assuming a positive, moderate correlation between measurements within the same individual: SD for the change = √(SD2 baseline + SD2 follow-up −2*0.5*SDbaseline*SDfollow up).
Supplemental material

upec-2017-0257-File010.docx

Download MS Word (59.2 KB)

upec-2017-0257-File009.docx

Download MS Word (48.8 KB)

upec-2017-0257-File008.docx

Download MS Word (60.6 KB)

upec-2017-0257-File007.docx

Download MS Word (35.3 KB)

upec-2017-0257-File006.docx

Download MS Word (47.4 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.