845
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Cardiovascular

Cost comparison of continued anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus placebo based on the 1-year EINSTEIN-Extension trial efficacy and safety results

ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 587-594 | Received 28 Sep 2017, Accepted 13 Feb 2018, Published online: 16 Mar 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. Base-case model inputs and ranges used in one-way sensitivity analysis.

Table 2. Drug costs per patient per year in rivaroxaban and placebo cohorts.

Table 3. Clinical event costs per patient per year in rivaroxaban and placebo cohorts.

Figure 1. Total healthcare cost difference per patient per year between rivaroxaban- and placebo-treated patients.

Figure 1. Total healthcare cost difference per patient per year between rivaroxaban- and placebo-treated patients.

Figure 2. Total healthcare cost difference per patient per year between rivaroxaban- and placebo-treated patients estimated in one-way sensitivity analysis. (1) Unit costs associated with drug, recurrent DVT, recurrent PE, major bleeding, or clinically relevant non-major bleeding varied by having its base unit cost decreased or increased by 20%. (2) The variation of a clinical event rate (i.e. recurrent DVT, recurrent PE, major bleeding, or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) was assessed based on the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of rate differences between cohorts that were reported in the EINSTEIN-EXT study (Wells et al.Citation17).

Figure 2. Total healthcare cost difference per patient per year between rivaroxaban- and placebo-treated patients estimated in one-way sensitivity analysis. (1) Unit costs associated with drug, recurrent DVT, recurrent PE, major bleeding, or clinically relevant non-major bleeding varied by having its base unit cost decreased or increased by 20%. (2) The variation of a clinical event rate (i.e. recurrent DVT, recurrent PE, major bleeding, or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) was assessed based on the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of rate differences between cohorts that were reported in the EINSTEIN-EXT study (Wells et al.Citation17).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.