1,814
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

TXNIP inhibition in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of quinazoline derivatives

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2166937 | Received 08 Dec 2022, Accepted 05 Jan 2023, Published online: 18 Jan 2023

Figures & data

Scheme 1. The design of target compounds.

Scheme 1. The design of target compounds.

Table 1. Primer sequences for real-time PCR assays.

Scheme 2. The synthetic route of quinazoline containing nitrogenous heterocyclic derivatives.

Scheme 2. The synthetic route of quinazoline containing nitrogenous heterocyclic derivatives.

Table 2. The structure of 20 quinazoline derivatives.

Figure 1. The anti-apoptosis activity with different concentrations of compounds D-2 and C-1. Min6 β cells were incubated with different concentrations of D-2 and C-1 and then exposed to PA (300 μmol/L) for 24 h. **p < 0.01 vs control cells; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs PA-treated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 5).

Figure 1. The anti-apoptosis activity with different concentrations of compounds D-2 and C-1. Min6 β cells were incubated with different concentrations of D-2 and C-1 and then exposed to PA (300 μmol/L) for 24 h. **p < 0.01 vs control cells; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs PA-treated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 5).

Table 3. The anti-apoptosis activity of quinazoline derivatives at a concentration of 100 μmol/L.

Figure 2. Compounds D-2 and C-1 inhibited TXNIP expression via promoting protein degradation. (A) Min6 β cells were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L for 24 h. (B) Min6 β cells were incubated with cycloheximide (50 μmol/L) and D-2 (10 μmol/L) with or without addition of MG-132 (10 μmol/L) for 24 h. (C) Min6 islet β cells were incubated with cycloheximide (50 μmol/L) and C-1 (10 μmol/L) with or without addition of MG-132 (10 μmol/L) for 24 h. Protein expression of TXNIP was measured by Western blot. **p < 0.01 vs control cells; ##p < 0.01 vs indicated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 4).

Figure 2. Compounds D-2 and C-1 inhibited TXNIP expression via promoting protein degradation. (A) Min6 β cells were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L for 24 h. (B) Min6 β cells were incubated with cycloheximide (50 μmol/L) and D-2 (10 μmol/L) with or without addition of MG-132 (10 μmol/L) for 24 h. (C) Min6 islet β cells were incubated with cycloheximide (50 μmol/L) and C-1 (10 μmol/L) with or without addition of MG-132 (10 μmol/L) for 24 h. Protein expression of TXNIP was measured by Western blot. **p < 0.01 vs control cells; ##p < 0.01 vs indicated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 4).

Figure 3. Compounds D-2 and C-1 reduced ROS generation in PA-induced Min6 cells. Min6 β cell were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L and then exposed to PA (300 μmol/L) for 8 h. Immunofluorescence staining for ROS was photographed by fluorescence microscopy. Bar: 100 μm.

Figure 3. Compounds D-2 and C-1 reduced ROS generation in PA-induced Min6 cells. Min6 β cell were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L and then exposed to PA (300 μmol/L) for 8 h. Immunofluorescence staining for ROS was photographed by fluorescence microscopy. Bar: 100 μm.

Figure 4. Compounds D-2 and C-1 protected Min6 cells from PA-induced inflammatory injury via TXNIP-NLRP3 signalling. Min6 β cell were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L and then exposed to PA (300 μmol/L) for 12 h. Protein expressions of TXNIP, NLRP3 and cleaved caspase 1 were measured by Western blot. *p < 0.05 & **p < 0.01 vs control cells; #p < 0.05 & ##p < 0.01 vs PA-treated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 4).

Figure 4. Compounds D-2 and C-1 protected Min6 cells from PA-induced inflammatory injury via TXNIP-NLRP3 signalling. Min6 β cell were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L and then exposed to PA (300 μmol/L) for 12 h. Protein expressions of TXNIP, NLRP3 and cleaved caspase 1 were measured by Western blot. *p < 0.05 & **p < 0.01 vs control cells; #p < 0.05 & ##p < 0.01 vs PA-treated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 4).

Figure 5. Compounds D-2 and C-1 inhibited gene expression of inflammatory cytokines. Min6 β cell were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L and then treated with PA (300 μmol/L) for 24 h. Gene expressions of IL-1β and IL-6 were detected using the RT-PCR method. **p < 0.01 vs control cells; #p < 0.05 & ##p < 0.01 vs PA-treated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 5).

Figure 5. Compounds D-2 and C-1 inhibited gene expression of inflammatory cytokines. Min6 β cell were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L and then treated with PA (300 μmol/L) for 24 h. Gene expressions of IL-1β and IL-6 were detected using the RT-PCR method. **p < 0.01 vs control cells; #p < 0.05 & ##p < 0.01 vs PA-treated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 5).

Figure 6. Compounds D-2 and C-1 inhibited caspase 3 activation. Min6 β cells were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L and then exposed to PA (300 μmol/L) for 12 h. Protein expression of cleaved caspase 3 was measured by Western blot. **p < 0.01 vs control cells; ##p < 0.01 vs PA-treated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 4).

Figure 6. Compounds D-2 and C-1 inhibited caspase 3 activation. Min6 β cells were incubated with D-2 and C-1 at concentration of 10 μmol/L and then exposed to PA (300 μmol/L) for 12 h. Protein expression of cleaved caspase 3 was measured by Western blot. **p < 0.01 vs control cells; ##p < 0.01 vs PA-treated cells. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 4).

Figure 7. Bioavailability radar plot of compounds D-2 and C-1.

Figure 7. Bioavailability radar plot of compounds D-2 and C-1.

Table 4. Physicochemical and pharmacokinetic parameters of compounds D-2 and C-1 predicted with SwissADME online tool.

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (53.1 KB)