1,177
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Meta-analysis

Comparing reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine boosters: a systematic review and meta-analysis

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 266-282 | Received 29 Jun 2023, Accepted 02 Feb 2024, Published online: 26 Feb 2024

Figures & data

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.

Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram.

Table 1. Study characteristics.

Figure 2. Map of countries with included studies.

Figure 2. Map of countries with included studies.

Forest plot 1. Risk ratios for fever – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 1. Risk ratios for fever – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 2. Risk ratios for fatigue – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 2. Risk ratios for fatigue – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 3. Risk ratios for headache – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 3. Risk ratios for headache – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 4. Risk ratios for injection site pain – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 4. Risk ratios for injection site pain – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 5. Risk ratios for redness – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 5. Risk ratios for redness – BNT162b2 30ug control.

Forest plot 6. Risk ratios for swelling – BNT162b2 30ug control.#Redness grading criteria for Chuang 2022 were based on impact during daily activities while the other trials used milimeter measurements.

Forest plot 6. Risk ratios for swelling – BNT162b2 30ug control.#Redness grading criteria for Chuang 2022 were based on impact during daily activities while the other trials used milimeter measurements.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (4.6 MB)

Data availability statement

Study data is available via reasonable requests directed to the corresponding author.