Figures & data
Table 1. General characteristics of the included studies in the present systematic review.
Table 2. Quality assessment of the included studies according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)*.
Table 3. Pooled proportions (95% CI) for the rate of pathogenetic or likely pathogenic genetic variants and for variants of unknown significance anomalies detected by WES in fetuses with increased NT and normal CMA and karyotype.
Mellis R, Eberhardt RY, Hamilton SJ, PAGE Consortium, et al. Fetal exome sequencing for isolated increased nuchal translucency: should we be doing it? BJOG. 2022;129(1):52–61. Xue S, Yan H, Chen J, et al. Genetic examination for fetuses with increased fetal nuchal translucency by genomic technology. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2020;160(2):57–62. Yang X, Huang LY, Pan M, et al. Exome sequencing improves genetic diagnosis of fetal increased nuchal translucency. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(11):1426–1431. Chen M, Chen J, Wang C, et al. Clinical application of medical exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetal structural anomalies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;251:119–124. Daum H, Meiner V, Elpeleg O, collaborating authors, et al. Fetal exome sequencing: yield and limitations in a tertiary referral center. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 53(1):80–86. Choy KW, Wang H, Shi M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with increased nuchal translucency by genome sequencing analysis. Front Genet. 2019; 10:761. Leung GKC, Mak CCY, Fung JLF, et al. Identifying the genetic causes for prenatally diagnosed structural congenital anomalies (SCAs) by whole-exome sequencing (WES). BMC Med Genomics. 2018; 11(1):93. Drury S, Williams H, Trump N, GOSGene, et al. Exome sequencing for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic abnormalities. Prenat Diagn. 2015; 35(10):1010–1017.