3,094
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effect of prophylactic caffeine in the treatment of apnea in very low birth weight infants: a meta-analysis

, , , , , , & show all
Article: 2214659 | Received 11 Jun 2022, Accepted 11 May 2023, Published online: 30 May 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow chart of study selection process.

Figure 1. Flow chart of study selection process.

Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.

Figure 2. Assessment of risk of bias. (A) Risk of bias graph about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies. (B) Summary of risk of bias for each trial. Plus sign: low risk of bias; minus sign: high risk of bias; question mark: unclear risk of bias.

Figure 2. Assessment of risk of bias. (A) Risk of bias graph about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies. (B) Summary of risk of bias for each trial. Plus sign: low risk of bias; minus sign: high risk of bias; question mark: unclear risk of bias.

Figure 3. Forest plots for the primary outcomes. The length of the line segment indicates the 95% confidence interval in each study. The red vertical lines represent the effect size. The black vertical lines represent invalid line. (A) AOP; (B) duration of mechanical ventilation; (C) duration of oxygen therapy.

Figure 3. Forest plots for the primary outcomes. The length of the line segment indicates the 95% confidence interval in each study. The red vertical lines represent the effect size. The black vertical lines represent invalid line. (A) AOP; (B) duration of mechanical ventilation; (C) duration of oxygen therapy.

Figure 4. Forest plots for the secondary outcomes. (A) BPD; (B) PDA; (C) ROP; (D) NEC; (E) IVH; (F) death before hospital discharge.

Figure 4. Forest plots for the secondary outcomes. (A) BPD; (B) PDA; (C) ROP; (D) NEC; (E) IVH; (F) death before hospital discharge.
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download Zip (177.9 KB)