Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Journal of Audiology Volume 63, 2024 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
623
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letters to the Editor

Pre-registration of audiology research studies: are actions following good intentions?

Garreth Prendergasta The Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Aala Sindia The Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK;b Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Faculty of Medical Rehabilitation Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi ArabiaView further author information
&
Kevin J Munroa The Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-9098View further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 226-228 | Received 03 Nov 2022, Accepted 13 Jan 2023, Published online: 03 Feb 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. The percentage of published papers which are pre-registered in the 10 identified journals for each field, expressed as a function of time.

Figure 1. The percentage of published papers which are pre-registered in the 10 identified journals for each field, expressed as a function of time.

Figure 2. The percentage of pre-registrations in each field as estimated by searching different repositories. The upper panel includes Clinical Trials Database, ISRCTN, PROSPERO and the OSF. The lower panel includes only OSF pre-registrations. The lower panel is likely the most accurate for comparing across disciplines, as there were clear differences in the distributions of clinical trials and reviews across the three disciplines, which will be a factor in the upper panel data.

Figure 2. The percentage of pre-registrations in each field as estimated by searching different repositories. The upper panel includes Clinical Trials Database, ISRCTN, PROSPERO and the OSF. The lower panel includes only OSF pre-registrations. The lower panel is likely the most accurate for comparing across disciplines, as there were clear differences in the distributions of clinical trials and reviews across the three disciplines, which will be a factor in the upper panel data.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.