1,206
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

A mixed treatment comparison of toxicity of gemcitabine combined with different targeted drugs in the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

&
Pages 497-506 | Received 05 Dec 2017, Accepted 23 Jan 2018, Published online: 16 Apr 2018

Figures & data

Figure 1. Flow chart showing literature search and study selection.

Figure 1. Flow chart showing literature search and study selection.

Figure 2. The Cochrane system bias evaluation of included literatures.

Figure 2. The Cochrane system bias evaluation of included literatures.

Table 1. Estimated OR and 95%CI of pairwise meta-analysis for hematologic toxicity events in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

Table 2. Estimated OR and 95%CI of pairwise meta-analysis for non-hematologic toxicity events in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer patients.

Figure 3. The network evidence graphs of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, rash, diarrhea and stomatitis (all grades, grade ≥ 3) (Gemcitabine + Placebo is taken as the reference for all targeted therapies; The size of the circle represents the sample size. The larger the circle, the larger the sample size is).

Figure 3. The network evidence graphs of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, rash, diarrhea and stomatitis (all grades, grade ≥ 3) (Gemcitabine + Placebo is taken as the reference for all targeted therapies; The size of the circle represents the sample size. The larger the circle, the larger the sample size is).

Table 3. OR and 95%CI of six treatment modalities of six hematologic endpoint outcomes.

Table 4. OR and 95%CI of six treatment modalities of six non-hematologic endpoint outcomes.

Table 5. SUCRA values of seven treatment modalities under twelve endpoint outcomes.

Figure 4. Cluster analyses of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, rash, diarrhea and stomatitis. (The 6 outcome indexes are considered, and the advantages and disadvantages of each intervention are compared; In each small square, the intervention measures in the upper right corner are “superior”, and the intervention measures in the lower left corner are “inferior”.).

Figure 4. Cluster analyses of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, rash, diarrhea and stomatitis. (The 6 outcome indexes are considered, and the advantages and disadvantages of each intervention are compared; In each small square, the intervention measures in the upper right corner are “superior”, and the intervention measures in the lower left corner are “inferior”.).
Supplemental material

suppl_KCBT_1433503.zip

Download Zip (258.2 KB)

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.