3,072
Views
87
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

International variation in shoulder arthroplasty

Incidence, indication, type of procedure, and outcomes evaluation in 9 countries

, , , , &
Pages 592-599 | Received 08 Feb 2017, Accepted 18 Jul 2017, Published online: 07 Sep 2017

Figures & data

Figure 1. Annual incidence of shoulder arthroplasty procedures per 105 inhabitants from 7 countries with a national registry.

Figure 1. Annual incidence of shoulder arthroplasty procedures per 105 inhabitants from 7 countries with a national registry.

Table 1. Registries included

Table 2. Incidence rates of shoulder prostheses in 2012 in the 7 countries with available national data

Table 3. Distribution of indications by country/region. Values are number (%)

Figure 2. Distribution of the 3 main shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed by country for the years 2000, 2006, and 2014. 2000: Denmark data from 2004; Norway data for 1994–2005. 2006: Australia and Germany data from 2008. 2014: Germany data from 2012; Sweden data from 2013.

Figure 2. Distribution of the 3 main shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed by country for the years 2000, 2006, and 2014. 2000: Denmark data from 2004; Norway data for 1994–2005. 2006: Australia and Germany data from 2008. 2014: Germany data from 2012; Sweden data from 2013.

Table 4. Distribution of types of procedures by country/region. Values are number (%)

Figure 3. Distributions of implant choice across 5 disease indications by country/region.

Figure 3. Distributions of implant choice across 5 disease indications by country/region.

Figure 4. Forest plot illustrating between-registry variation in proportion of total conventional arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis.

Figure 4. Forest plot illustrating between-registry variation in proportion of total conventional arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis.

Figure 5. Forest plot illustrating between-registry variation in proportion of total reverse arthroplasty in patients with cuff tear arthropathy.

Figure 5. Forest plot illustrating between-registry variation in proportion of total reverse arthroplasty in patients with cuff tear arthropathy.

Figure 6. Forest plot illustrating between-registry variation in proportion of hemi-arthroplasty in patients with fracture.

Figure 6. Forest plot illustrating between-registry variation in proportion of hemi-arthroplasty in patients with fracture.
Supplemental material

IORT_A_1368884_SUPP.PDF

Download PDF (35.5 KB)