3,947
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty in 30,830 patients with hip fractures: data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register on revision and risk factors for revision

, , , &
Pages 509-514 | Received 19 Mar 2018, Accepted 11 Jun 2018, Published online: 06 Aug 2018

Figures & data

Table 1. Baseline characteristics and surgical details of patients with a hip fracture treated with a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or a hemiarthroplasty (HA)

Figure 1. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) of revision estimates from competing risks data (1 – survival) for patients treated with HA and THA (n = 30,830).

Figure 1. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) of revision estimates from competing risks data (1 – survival) for patients treated with HA and THA (n = 30,830).

Table 2. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) estimates from competing risks data (1-survival) for patients treated with HA and THA

Table 3. Reasons for revision after hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip fractures

Table 4. Factors associated with revision in hip fracture patients after hemiarthroplasty (HA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a univariable analysis with a hazard analysis

Table 5. Factors associated with revision in hip fracture treated with a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or a hemiarthroplasty (HA) in a multivariable approach with hazards model with time-varying covariables

Table 6. Reason for revision in factors associated with revision in hip fracture treated with a total hip arthroplasty (THA) or a hemiarthroplasty (HA)

Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (1.3 MB)