1,293
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Increasing but levelling out risk of revision due to infection after total hip arthroplasty: a study on 108,854 primary THAs in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 to 2019

, , , , , , , , , , , & show all

Figures & data

Figure 1. Relationship between year of primary surgery and risk of revision due to deep infection (with 95% confidence interval) for all THAs, adjusted for sex, age, ASA class, indication for primary THA, duration of surgery, surgical approach, and modularity of the THA. The broken line represents the HRR in 2005 (HRR = 1).

Figure 1. Relationship between year of primary surgery and risk of revision due to deep infection (with 95% confidence interval) for all THAs, adjusted for sex, age, ASA class, indication for primary THA, duration of surgery, surgical approach, and modularity of the THA. The broken line represents the HRR in 2005 (HRR = 1).

Figure 2. Curves of adjusted revision-percentage due to deep infection, for all THAs, for cemented THAs, uncemented THAs, reverse hybrid THAs, and hybrid THAs, for 3 periods of primary surgery, adjusted for sex, age, ASA class, indication for primary THA, duration of surgery, surgical approach, and modularity of the THA.

Figure 2. Curves of adjusted revision-percentage due to deep infection, for all THAs, for cemented THAs, uncemented THAs, reverse hybrid THAs, and hybrid THAs, for 3 periods of primary surgery, adjusted for sex, age, ASA class, indication for primary THA, duration of surgery, surgical approach, and modularity of the THA.

Table 1. Absolute annual number of primary THAs and revisions due to infection for the period 2005–2019

Figure 3. The relationship between HRR of revision due to infection and time­span postoperatively after primary THAs for the period 2010–2014 (red line) and 2015–2019 (green line) compared with 2005–2009 (blue lines). Smoothed Schoenfeld residuals adjusted for sex, age, ASA class, indication for primary THA, duration of surgery, surgical approach, and modularity of the THA (solid lines) with 95% confidence intervals (broken lines).

Figure 3. The relationship between HRR of revision due to infection and time­span postoperatively after primary THAs for the period 2010–2014 (red line) and 2015–2019 (green line) compared with 2005–2009 (blue lines). Smoothed Schoenfeld residuals adjusted for sex, age, ASA class, indication for primary THA, duration of surgery, surgical approach, and modularity of the THA (solid lines) with 95% confidence intervals (broken lines).
Supplemental material

Supplemental Material

Download PDF (35 KB)