“You have to argue the right way”: user involvement in the service delivery process for assistive activity technology

Figures & data

Table 1. Codes and code groups.

Code groups:	Codes (examples):
Getting the help that you need requires having the same possibilities as others	You end up not applying if the process is to complex There will be trial and error because users are different It is important to provide good information to people who come in such situations Emphasis is placed on the social surroundings, people that can assist That is what I had to write to get the AAT
Practically using AAT requires understanding	In the practical understanding, there is a lot of responsibility on the municipality Asphalt, grass, gravel, mountains, an aid can be used for many activities It is not enough just looking at it and think it will work They are professionals, but they do not have practical experience themselves

Table 2. Main features of the sample of assistive activity technology users.

Gender	Female (n = 11)	Male (n = 33)
Age	18–30 years	31–45 years	46–60 years	61–67 years	Unknown
	(n = 7)	(n = 14)	(n = 16)	(n = 5)	(n = 2)
Mobility-Equipment used	Electric Weel Chair	Manual Weel Chair	Crutches /Caine	Foot prosthesis	No mobility equipment
	(n = 27)	(n = 19)	(n = 9)	(n = 3)	(n = 10)
Activities by using AAT	Outdoor individual summer activity	Outdoor individual winter activity	Outdoor team activity/sport	Indoor individual activity	Indoor team activity
	(n = 41)	(n = 14)	(n = 12)	(n = 4)	(n = 9)