Figures & data
Table 1. Correlation between cytoplasmic TIMP3 protein expression patterns and clinico-pathological features of OC
Figure 1. Immunohistochemical staining of cytoplasmic TIMP3 at 40X magnification: (A) Negative cytoplasmic expression, (B) Weak expression, (C) Moderate cytoplasmic expression, (D) Strong cytoplasmic expression
![Figure 1. Immunohistochemical staining of cytoplasmic TIMP3 at 40X magnification: (A) Negative cytoplasmic expression, (B) Weak expression, (C) Moderate cytoplasmic expression, (D) Strong cytoplasmic expression](/cms/asset/267720a2-3edb-49a6-a2aa-2dc8b7de83d1/zljm_a_1937866_f0001_oc.jpg)
Figure 2. Cytoplasmic TIMP3 expression (0,1 vs 2,3) as determinant of disease specific survival (DSS) in univariate (Kaplan–Meier) analysis (p = 0.02, log rank)
![Figure 2. Cytoplasmic TIMP3 expression (0,1 vs 2,3) as determinant of disease specific survival (DSS) in univariate (Kaplan–Meier) analysis (p = 0.02, log rank)](/cms/asset/4e766c23-50ca-41c2-ad0f-5cc5c2ace6c3/zljm_a_1937866_f0002_oc.jpg)
Figure 3. Cytoplasmic TIMP3 expression (0,1 vs 2,3) as determinant of disease-free survival (DFS) in univariate (Kaplan–Meier) analysis. (p = 0.42, log rank)
![Figure 3. Cytoplasmic TIMP3 expression (0,1 vs 2,3) as determinant of disease-free survival (DFS) in univariate (Kaplan–Meier) analysis. (p = 0.42, log rank)](/cms/asset/502e2325-2351-4e4e-b94b-cd13adad3281/zljm_a_1937866_f0003_oc.jpg)
Table 2. Cox’s regression analysis of the prognostic values of TIMP3 protein expression pattern, age at diagnosis, histological subtypes, lymph node status, tumor stage and grade