656
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Case study of designing and evaluating an independent open learner model tool

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , &
Article: 2237331 | Received 28 Nov 2022, Accepted 04 Jul 2023, Published online: 20 Jul 2023

Figures & data

Figure 1. Task-oriented portfolio instructional setting.

Figure 1. Task-oriented portfolio instructional setting.

Figure 2. Phases and processes of self-regulation.

Figure 2. Phases and processes of self-regulation.

Figure 3. Target grade setting visualization.

Figure 3. Target grade setting visualization.

Figure 4. (a) Task list showing workload for a pass grade. (b) Task List showing work for a High Distinction grade.

Figure 4. (a) Task list showing workload for a pass grade. (b) Task List showing work for a High Distinction grade.

Figure 5. A tornado chart showing the usage and usefulness rating for Target Grade Setting.

Figure 5. A tornado chart showing the usage and usefulness rating for Target Grade Setting.

Figure 6. Task list using colours to show task statuses.

Figure 6. Task list using colours to show task statuses.

Figure 7. Focus list showing tasks to keep student on track.

Figure 7. Focus list showing tasks to keep student on track.

Figure 8. Burndown chart is designed to help students to self-assess their progress.

Figure 8. Burndown chart is designed to help students to self-assess their progress.

Figure 9. Task summary chart showing summary of task statuses for an individual student.

Figure 9. Task summary chart showing summary of task statuses for an individual student.

Figure 10. Outcome alignment and achievement chart presenting information about individual and group LO achievements.

Figure 10. Outcome alignment and achievement chart presenting information about individual and group LO achievements.

Figure 11. Outcome alignment and achievement task view showing links between learning outcome and tasks.

Figure 11. Outcome alignment and achievement task view showing links between learning outcome and tasks.

Figure 12. User usage and usefulness rating for OLM visualizations in monitoring performance.

Figure 12. User usage and usefulness rating for OLM visualizations in monitoring performance.

Figure 13. Task alignment rating for facilitating student self-reflection.

Figure 13. Task alignment rating for facilitating student self-reflection.

Figure 14. User usage and usefulness rating for the task alignment rating.

Figure 14. User usage and usefulness rating for the task alignment rating.