1,428
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original article

Patterns of use of oral anticancer treatments in France: a Retrospective Analysis of Cancer Treatments given ORally from 2004 to 2012 (Re-ACTOR study)

, , , &
Pages 323-332 | Accepted 04 Nov 2014, Published online: 24 Nov 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. Summary of the Oncology Analyzer methodology. *Participation in the panel was restricted to physicians who could be expected to include the target number of 15 patients for each quarter.

Figure 1. Summary of the Oncology Analyzer methodology. *Participation in the panel was restricted to physicians who could be expected to include the target number of 15 patients for each quarter.

Table 1. Treatment categories used in the analyses according to EphMRA classification.

Figure 2. Flow chart of patients included in the analyses between October 2011 and September 2012.*Figures presented are for those included in Oncology Analyzer between October 2011 (4Q2011) and September 2012 (3Q2012). †Intravenous treatments were defined as intravenous, bolus, infusion or continuous infusion. ‡Patients treated with other treatments (i.e. radiotherapy and surgery) and treated with chemotherapy by other route of administration (subcutaneous, intravesical…) were excluded from the analysis. $ATC codes B3C, L3A1, A4A, N1A2, N2A, N2B, M5B4 and M5B9 were excluded from the analysis.

Figure 2. Flow chart of patients included in the analyses between October 2011 and September 2012.*Figures presented are for those included in Oncology Analyzer between October 2011 (4Q2011) and September 2012 (3Q2012). †Intravenous treatments were defined as intravenous, bolus, infusion or continuous infusion. ‡Patients treated with other treatments (i.e. radiotherapy and surgery) and treated with chemotherapy by other route of administration (subcutaneous, intravesical…) were excluded from the analysis. $ATC codes B3C, L3A1, A4A, N1A2, N2A, N2B, M5B4 and M5B9 were excluded from the analysis.

Figure 3. Trend in the use of oral anticancer treatments between October 2004 and September 2012.

Figure 3. Trend in the use of oral anticancer treatments between October 2004 and September 2012.

Figure 4. Age distribution and route of treatment administration for patients included between October 2011 and September 2012.

Figure 4. Age distribution and route of treatment administration for patients included between October 2011 and September 2012.

Table 2. Distribution of patients by year according to the route of administration, the treatment category and cancer stage.

Table 3. Distribution of patients receiving OATs by molecule between October 2011 and September 2012 (N = 2410).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.