812
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Is the ideal anticoagulant a myth?

Pages 231-236 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014

Figures & data

Figure 1. The coagulation network.

Here the initiation of clot formation is shown via tissue-bound tissue factor and clot formation occurs when the cumulative production of fibrin reaches a threshold value. The coagulation network is described by a computer model that allows for in vivo interactions and application of in vitro clotting time tests.

APC: Activated protein C; AT-III: Antithrombin III; CA: Contact activator; F: Fibrin; PC: Protein C; PS: Protein S; TF: Tissue factor; Tmod: Thrombomodulin; VKO: Vitamin K epoxide; XF: Cross-linked fibrin.

Adapted with permission from Citation[6].

Figure 1. The coagulation network.Here the initiation of clot formation is shown via tissue-bound tissue factor and clot formation occurs when the cumulative production of fibrin reaches a threshold value. The coagulation network is described by a computer model that allows for in vivo interactions and application of in vitro clotting time tests.APC: Activated protein C; AT-III: Antithrombin III; CA: Contact activator; F: Fibrin; PC: Protein C; PS: Protein S; TF: Tissue factor; Tmod: Thrombomodulin; VKO: Vitamin K epoxide; XF: Cross-linked fibrin.Adapted with permission from Citation[6].
Figure 2. A pharmacological utility curve estimated for warfarin in the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation.

Here an Emax model is fitted to the thrombotic rates (expressed as thrombotic rate saved) and a power model to the intracranial hemorrhage rates. Positive values of this utility function describe net benefits of treatments; negative values describe net losses. The dashed lines are either thrombosis rates saved (positive utility) or intracranial hemorrhage caused (negative utility). The solid line is the difference of those rates under the simple assumption that a positive benefit is equally as good as a negative loss is bad.

INR: International normalized ratio.

Data taken from Citation[8].

Figure 2. A pharmacological utility curve estimated for warfarin in the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation.Here an Emax model is fitted to the thrombotic rates (expressed as thrombotic rate saved) and a power model to the intracranial hemorrhage rates. Positive values of this utility function describe net benefits of treatments; negative values describe net losses. The dashed lines are either thrombosis rates saved (positive utility) or intracranial hemorrhage caused (negative utility). The solid line is the difference of those rates under the simple assumption that a positive benefit is equally as good as a negative loss is bad.INR: International normalized ratio.Data taken from Citation[8].
Figure 3. The coagulation network, highlighting potential or existing targets.

Current targets include the VKORIs (e.g., warfarin), DTIs (e.g., dabigatran), aXa (e.g., rivaroxaban) and an investigational target depicting activity at TF:VIIa.

APC: Activated protein C; AT-III: Antithrombin III; aXa: Factor Xa antagonist; CA: Contact activator; DTI: Direct thrombin inhibitor; F: Fibrin; PC: Protein C; PS: Protein S; TF: Tissue factor; Tmod: Thrombomodulin; VKO: Vitamin K epoxide; VKORI: Vitamin K oxide reductase inhibitor; XF: Cross-linked fibrin.

Adapted with permission from Citation[6].

Figure 3. The coagulation network, highlighting potential or existing targets.Current targets include the VKORIs (e.g., warfarin), DTIs (e.g., dabigatran), aXa (e.g., rivaroxaban) and an investigational target depicting activity at TF:VIIa.APC: Activated protein C; AT-III: Antithrombin III; aXa: Factor Xa antagonist; CA: Contact activator; DTI: Direct thrombin inhibitor; F: Fibrin; PC: Protein C; PS: Protein S; TF: Tissue factor; Tmod: Thrombomodulin; VKO: Vitamin K epoxide; VKORI: Vitamin K oxide reductase inhibitor; XF: Cross-linked fibrin.Adapted with permission from Citation[6].

Table 1. Between-subject variability in clearance for oral anticoagulants.

Table 2. Unpredictable variability in clotting factors.

Table 3. Ranges of international normalized ratio values for various drug targets.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.