86
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

A multi-biomarker disease activity score for monitoring rheumatoid arthritis

, , , &
Pages 69-78 | Published online: 06 Oct 2015

Figures & data

Figure 1 Description of the multi-step process used in determination of the MBDA score algorithm.

Note: Numbers in column represent number of patients (in some instances, patients might contribute to more than one visit).
Abbreviations: BRASS, Brigham and Women’s RA Sequential Study; CAMERA, Computer Assisted Management in Early RA; InFoRM, Index for RA Measurement-Crescendo Bioscience Study; Leiden, Leiden Early Arthritis Cohort; MBDA, multi-biomarker disease activity; OKC, Oklahoma City Community Cohort; DAS28, 28-joint disease activity score; CRP, C-reactive protein; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; DA, disease activity.
Figure 1 Description of the multi-step process used in determination of the MBDA score algorithm.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients based on classification of disease activity by multi-biomarker disease activity score in validation studies

Table 2 Cross-sectional correlations with additional clinical disease activity measures for the MBDA score and CRPTable Footnotea

Figure 2 Relationship between the MBDA score and clinical disease activity indices. Correlation and linear regression of MBDA score with DAS28-ESR (A), SDAI (B), and CDAI (C).

Note: Hirata S, Dirven L, Shen Y, et al. A multi-biomarker score measures rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in the BeSt study. Rheumatology. 2013(7);52:1202–1207, by permission of Oxford University Press.Citation24
Abbreviations: CDAI, clinical disease activity index; DAS28, 28-joint disease activity score; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MBDA, multi-biomarker disease activity; SDAI, simple disease activity index.
Figure 2 Relationship between the MBDA score and clinical disease activity indices. Correlation and linear regression of MBDA score with DAS28-ESR (A), SDAI (B), and CDAI (C).

Table 3 Ratios of median disease activity measuresTable Footnotea between RA patients with and without common comorbidities

Figure 3 MBDA scores by treatment arm and time point.

Notes: For each treatment strategy (ie, intensive tight control MTX-based [n=39] and conventional MTX-based [n=15] treatment strategy), the results of the MBDA score are shown at baseline and after 6 months of treatment. Only results of patients with MBDA score at baseline and 6 months are shown. Reproduced from Bakker MF, Cavet G, Jacobs JW, et al. Performance of a multi-biomarker score measuring rheumatoid arthritis disease activity in the CAMERA tight control study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(10):1692–1697, copyright © 2012, with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.Citation21
Abbreviations: MBDA, multi-biomarker disease activity; MTX, methotrexate.
Figure 3 MBDA scores by treatment arm and time point.

Figure 4 Changes (Δ) in MBDA score by EULAR response at week 52.

Notes: Box and whisker plot of ΔMBDA score from baseline to 52 weeks after initiation of TNF inhibitor treatment in patients with no, moderate, and good treatment response at 52 weeks as defined by EULAR criteria. Statistical significance of the difference between the responder groups was assessed by Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test. Thick horizontal line indicates the median; box indicates the interquartile range (IQR); and whiskers indicate the most extreme points within 1.5 times the IQR from the limits of the box. Hirata S, Li W, Defranoux N, et al. A multi-biomarker disease activity score tracks clinical response consistently in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with different anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies: A retrospective observational study. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(3):344–349, copyright © 2014, Informa Healthcare.Citation27 Reproduced with permission of Informa Healthcare.
Abbreviations: BL, baseline; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; IQR, interquartile range; MBDA, multi-biomarker disease activity; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
Figure 4 Changes (Δ) in MBDA score by EULAR response at week 52.

Figure 5 Probability plots of radiographic progression at year 1 for high, moderate, and low disease activity patient (n=235) grouped according to baseline MBDA (A), CRP (B), DAS28 (C), and ESR (D).

Notes: Each black circle represents a patient with low disease activity, the red triangle indicates moderate disease activity, and the blue square indicates high disease activity. Horizontal dashed line represents ΔSHS =5 from baseline to 1 year, above which the change is considered as rapid radiographic progression (ΔSHS >5). Reproduced from Hambardzumyan K, Bolce R, Saevarsdottir S, et al. Pretreatment multi-biomarker disease activity score and radiographic progression in early RA: results from the SWEFOT trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(6):1102–1109, copyright © 2014, with permission from BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.Citation30
Abbreviations: CRP, C-reactive protein; DA, disease activity; DAS28, 28-joint disease activity score; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; MBDA, multi-biomarker disease activity; SHS, Sharp-van der Heijde score.
Figure 5 Probability plots of radiographic progression at year 1 for high, moderate, and low disease activity patient (n=235) grouped according to baseline MBDA (A), CRP (B), DAS28 (C), and ESR (D).

Table S1 Twelve biomarkers reflect the heterogeneity of RA