IPE-COM: a pilot study on interprofessional learning design for medical and midwifery students

Figures & data

Table 1 IPE-COM learning design adapted for Indonesia

Phase	Instruction	Activities
First	IPE socialization and training	Students and supervisors trained about IPE and community development in health services.
Second	Implementation IPE-CBL with 7 steps: Identify the stakeholders in the community Approach the community Assess the needs of local communities Planning project in each perspective. Focus project Implementation of the project Reflection	Students engaged in community in order to do health projects
Third	Evaluation by IPE students’ report	Students reported their learning experiences to supervisors

Table 2 Characteristics of participants

Characteristics	Frequency
Gender
a. Male	6 people (18%)
b. Female	28 people (82%)
Profession
a. Midwife	19 people (56%)
b. Doctor	15 people (44%)
Supervisor
a. Doctor	2 people (50%)
b. Midwife	2 people (50%)
Supervisor educational background
a. Master	2 people (50%)
b. Bachelor degree/profession	1 person (25%)
c. 3-Year diploma	1 person (25%)

Table 3 Data on inter-rater reliability test

Competency	Result of intraclass correlation*
	Data pre-test	Data post-test
Communication	0.848	0.853
Collaboration	0.867	0.870
Role and responsibility	0.738**	0.827
Collaborative patient-centered approach	0.823	0.887
Team functioning	0.911	0.815
Conflict management/resolution	0.847	0.898

Notes: *Intraclass correlation >0.80=high stability. **Intraclass correlation 0.50–0.80=moderate stability.

Table 4 Wilcoxon test result

Competency		Pre-test				Post-test			Value P*	Effect size
	Min	Max	Median	SD	Min	Max	Median	SD
1. Communication	2.29	3.16	2.87	0.22	2.79	3.33	3.04	0.20	0.00	1.33**
2. Collaboration	2.43	3.25	2.68	0.29	2.68	3.50	3.06	0.26	0.00	1.37**
3. Role and responsibility	2.03	3.46	2.62	0.28	2.75	3.46	3.05	0.16	0.00	1.88**
4. Collaborative patient-centered approach	2.06	3.00	2.50	0.25	2.25	3.25	2.87	0.30	0.00	0.86***
5. Team Functioning	1.75	3.20	2.50	0.31	2.90	3.65	3.20	0.20	0.00	2.76**
6. Conflict management/resolution	2.06	3.00	2.59	0.25	2.62	3.68	3.25	0.31	0.00	2.45**

Notes: *Value P<0.05 meaning there is a statistically significant difference. **Effect size d>1.00 meaning the intervention effect is statistically strong. ***Effect size 0.51≤d≤1.00 meaning the intervention effect is statistically moderate.

Figure 1 Difference on collaborative competency perception value in each profession.